CNN reduces Michelle Obama to her biceps

I’m not entirely sure how I feel about this. On the one hand, I am a big fan of the Obamas, and yes, I’ve noticed that they’re a relatively young, attractive couple. But, on the other hand, I’m annoyed that this is the most interesting thing CNN could find to write about Michelle Obama. Case in point:

“Those toned arms are becoming a trademark. And a source of inspiration for some women.”

Really? I hadn’t noticed. Yes, first ladies often set the trends in fashion; just think of Jackie Kennedy. But is it really neccesary to reduce Michelle Obama to ‘nice arms”?

There’s also the fact that people even notice, and feel the need to comment on, her physical appearance. Does it matter what the first lady looks like? Will her choice of attire influence policy? Will her body shape affect the difference she can make in the world? I think not. It’s not really that important.

Should I be annoyed at this? Or am I just being too wary of sexism?