Pro-choice groups take Texas’s huge anti-choice law to court

Remember that epic anti-choice bill that became law in Texas, despite the inspiring efforts of pro-choice activists and made-for-TV-level-heroine and future Governor (fingers crossed!) Wendy Davis? Now the fight is headed to the courts.

On Friday, Planned Parenthood, the Center for Reproductive Rights, and the ACLU filed a lawsuit against part of the law. Specifically, they’re asking the courts to block the provisions that, if allowed to go into effect at the end of October, would deal an immediate and drastic hit to abortion access: the restrictions on medication abortion and the requirement that abortion providers have admitting privileges at a local hospital. The admitting privileges provision alone is expected to force 13 clinics to close their doors. (Check out these sad maps to get a sense of the geographic barriers that would create.)

What’s amazing is that this lawsuit isn’t even tackling all of terribleness in this massive law. It also includes a blatantly unconstitutional 20-week abortion ban (which advocates are letting slide for now) and ridiculous, medically unnecessary TRAP clinic regulations (things like how wide the hallways must be) which haven’t been specified yet but will likely lead to another round of clinic closures when they go into effect a year from now. 

Texas is a perfect example of how state anti-choice laws pile up. Overlay a bunch of seemingly minor restrictions on top of each other and suddenly you’re looking at a state where more than 130,000 women have lost access to preventative health care and folks have to drive 400 miles to get an abortion. “Any one of these restrictions would have a devastating impact across the state of Texas,” CRR’s Nancy Northup explains. “Together they would be catastrophic, making essential reproductive health care services for many Texans, especially poor and rural women, practically impossible to access.”

Atlanta, GA

Maya Dusenbery is an Executive Director in charge of Editorial at Feministing. Maya has previously worked at NARAL Pro-Choice New York and the National Institute for Reproductive Health and was a fellow at Mother Jones magazine. She graduated with a B.A. from Carleton College in 2008. A Minnesota native, she currently lives, writes, edits, and bakes bread in Atlanta, Georgia.

Maya Dusenbery is an Executive Director of Feministing in charge of Editorial.

Read more about Maya

Join the Conversation

  • sarah demuro

    What’s insane about this is that they don’t have these same rules for oral surgeons and such. I was knocked out cold when I had my wisdom teeth removed at 19. What if I’d gone into cardiac arrest? There was no hospital nearby. And yet you don’t see these right wingers targeting oral surgeons. It’s so obvious what their real agenda is and as a woman and a proud Texan, it makes me sick. I had an abortion in college and the doctor who performed it was quoted in a national news article saying that he would have to close his clinic. He can’t afford to make the changes necessary to stay open. This doctor is a wonderful, compassionate man. I hate to think that because of this draconian law, there will be less doctors like him available. The war on women is real. No matter what those on the right say. I’m voting for Wendy Davis in 2014. The insanity has got to stop. This is a true backlash against women. And it’s just gotten started.