Hillary Sexism Watch: “Female Agenda” Edition

via Pam, I see that Bill O’Reilly and Marc Rudov (a Frank TJ Mackey type whose admonition to men is, “YOU Are Tolerating Her Nonsense!”) had a meaningful, nuanced chat about the “downside” of female leadership:

O’REILLY: Tonight, we begin a brand new segment called, “He Said, She Said,� where we’ll deal with issues from a gender-based point of view. The segment will run every Friday, but we wanted to debut it tonight with a very provocative question: What is the downside of having a woman become president of the United States?
…RUDOV: You mean besides the PMS and the mood swings, right?
O’REILLY: But guys have mood swings, Marc. And you know —
RUDOV: Right.
O’REILLY: — they have other control issues, as we just heard with Governor Spitzer and we saw with various presidents. So come on now, let’s be fair.
RUDOV: Well, you know, I’m joking. Of course, the main problem I have is if a woman has a female agenda. If she doesn’t have a female agenda, if she just wants to be an executive for all the people, then all I care about is if she’s qualified. And I have no qualms about having a female president.
But if we take Hillary Clinton, she specifically does have a female agenda.

Pam wonders if this is sorta like the Homosexual Agenda conservatives are always so worried about? Or maybe Rudov thinks the “female agenda” is just the search for some good PMS remedies.
Video below the jump.
More editions of Hillary Sexism Watch here.