Romney chastised woman for getting life-saving abortion

I’m a few days late on this, but it’s too important to overlook. Jessica pointed out a New York Times piece from last week on Romney’s history of leadership in the Mormon community, including people’s encounters with his “spiritual guidance” — to find one woman’s experience when getting an abortion due to a potentially life-threatening blood clot:

Mormons oppose abortion, except in extreme cases like rape, incest or where the life of the woman is in danger — and require that church elders be consulted. In 1990, Exponent II, a Mormon feminist magazine that Ms. Dushku, the Suffolk University professor, helped found, published an article by a married mother of four who recounted her own experience after doctors advised her to terminate her pregnancy when she was being treated for a potentially dangerous blood clot. Her bishop got wind of the situation, she wrote, and showed up unannounced at the hospital, warning her sternly not to go forward.

While Dushku declined to talk to the Times, Jessica also points out that Feministing actually covered this story back in 2007, including an interview with Dushku found at another source where she divulges what happened:

We’ll call her woman “X”. She was an active member of the ward where Romney was bishop in Massachusetts, at that time in a neighboring community where I was not a member. The stake president was a doctor named Gordon and was an old friend of X. X and her husband went to the hospital because she had an aching in her leg. Her doctor was alarmed after examining her, telling her she had developed blood clots and could not carry the pregnancy to full term. He said they’d have to give her blood thinners in order to get rid of the clots and that they would endanger the baby. X had lost her first baby; the child was born with many physical problems and died at two or three weeks old. X was already the mother of four teenage children. This would have been her sixth.

…First of all the stake president – Gordon – came by to see X with a friend and said well it looks like you have to do this – terminate the pregnancy. He was perfectly comfortable with X’s decision, since both she and the child were in peril. And Gordon was technically higher in the LDS church hierarchy than Mitt was as bishop.

So then Mitt came in to the hospital. X thought Mitt had come to be comforting because that’s what bishops do. They have a pastoral role. But she said that instead he was critical.

He said – What do you think you’re doing?

She said – Well, we have to abort the baby because I have these blood clots.

And he said something to the effect of – Well, why do you get off easy when other women have their babies?

And she said – What are you talking about? This is a life threatening situation.

And he said – Well what about the life of the baby?

And she said – I have four other children and I think it would be really irresponsible to continue the pregnancy.

X said she found herself arguing with Romney about her medical crisis, said he was very unsympathetic, very critical, and said that under the circumstances in no way did he condone her aborting the child. And he left.

That’s right — Romney’s spiritual guidance includes shaming women saving their own lives. Some leadership qualities, huh.

and tagged , , , . Bookmark the permalink. Both comments and trackbacks are currently closed.

5 Comments

  1. Posted October 24, 2011 at 12:45 pm | Permalink

    Thanks for posting about this. I touched on the trouble with Romney in my post last week about Mississippi’s question 26. Bottom line: a cave man who speaks Harvard, lives in a $12 million home and wears expensive suits is still a cave man – one no feminist should make peace with.

  2. Posted October 24, 2011 at 12:46 pm | Permalink

    Thanks for posting about this. I touched on the trouble with Romney in my post last week about Mississippi’s question 26. Bottom line: a cave man who speaks Harvard, lives in a $12 million home and wears expensive suits is still a cave man – one no feminist should make peace with.

    http://thelittlegrape.blogspot.com/2011/10/grape-goes-carpet-bagging.html

  3. Posted October 24, 2011 at 6:04 pm | Permalink

    “Well, why do you get off easy when other women have their babies?”

    What is it with the obsession anti-choice people have with hurting women? That quote reveals so much of the anti-choice perspective. If he really believed a fetus was a person, he wouldn’t have said that. But “pro-life” is not what Mitt Romney was about when he said this. It’s about harming women, punishing them, controlling their bodies and their lives, and taking away a woman’s power. I just don’t understand how they hate women so much. The idea of Romney in the White House is scary for many reasons, especially because of how dangerous he is to women.

  4. Posted October 24, 2011 at 7:26 pm | Permalink

    i’d like to see Romney in Woman X’s position and see what he does…

  5. Posted October 24, 2011 at 9:21 pm | Permalink

    This same cave man even said earlier today that you can’t say, “I’m personally pro-life but I think the government should stay out of it.” “That’s not pro-life, that’s trying to have your cake and eat it too,” he said.

    Women whose lives are in danger because of a pregnancy deserve to choose to live. Unbelievable, the way Mitt Romney treated that woman in this article. Didn’t he hear or even care that she had those fatal blood clots? Didn’t he hear or even care that if she did die, her kids would be left without a mother? Unbelievable that he would have just let her suffer and die if he had his way. “Pro-LIFE,” indeed.

Feministing In Your Inbox

Sign up for our Newsletter to stay in touch with Feministing
and receive regular updates and exclusive content.

174 queries. 0.308 seconds