Global contraception news, Captain Obvious edition

Share on TwitterShare on TumblrSubmit to StumbleUponDigg This

As a reminder that the US is not the only place on Earth where folks have to fight for their right to contraception, last week we learned  from the UN that that it is in fact just as we suspected!: Women need access to both hormonal contraceptives and condoms to prevent unwanted pregnancy and HIV infection.

UNAIDS in Geneva did yet another study on the issue. They reviewed recent epidemiological studies on the transmission and acquisition of HIV by women using hormonal contraceptives to see if the current model was still the right one. They found that it is indeed true (as stated in the WHO‘s current recommendation) that condoms are the most effective method to prevent HIV infection. In a press statement, the agency stated:

“While a range of contraceptives protect against unintended pregnancies, only condoms, male and female, provide dual protection by stopping HIV transmission and preventing unintended pregnancies.”

According the UN about half of the 34 million people living with HIV are women. In sub-Saharan Africa, almost 60 percent of all new HIV infections occur in women. press statement. Michel Sidibé, Executive Director of UNAIDS, said:

“Women need safe contraceptive and HIV prevention options that they can own and manage. New investments into research for female controlled HIV prevention options and safe contraceptive methods are essential…Not giving women and girls access to these methods increases their vulnerability to HIV infection.”

UNAIDS recommends that people who are sexually active should have full access to information and counseling to make informed choices about their sexual and reproductive health needs. Access to contraception saves lives! Captain Obvious (photo unavailable), a superhero that wears a shiny leotard, has this very statement emblazoned on buttons and totebags that she distributes when traveling the world.

Can someone send this memo to the leaders of the GOP? And add this to the thing we tell folks in sex-ed?  OK, thanks.

Share on TwitterShare on TumblrSubmit to StumbleUponDigg This
Leave a comment

The Academic Feminist: Transforming Sex Education with Mimi Arbeit

Share on TwitterShare on TumblrSubmit to StumbleUponDigg This

Welcome back to The Academic Feminist, the series that bridges the blogging/academic divide by linking discussions in feminist academia to those taking place online. Today’s interviewee is Mimi Arbeit, a doctoral student in Child Development at Tufts University. You can learn more about Arbeit’s work on her blog.  All comments and suggestions for The Academic Feminist can sent to the editor here or on Twitter @gwendolynb.

Can you talk a little about your main research interests, and what led you to choose this area? 

I study adolescent sexuality using a positive approach, which means I believe sex and sexuality are important, meaningful, and potentially positive elements of adolescent development. I’m interested in how school-based and out-of-school-time programs can help adolescents develop a sense of embodiment and sexual agency, and cultivate the social, emotional, and cognitive skills they need to make healthy decisions and engage in fulfilling relationships.

My whole life has led me to choose this area of research! In high school, I taught workshops to eighth grade students about gender stereotypes, sexual harassment, and gender violence. My classroom experience helped me frame my analysis of my own problems, and the problems I saw in the world, through a lens of gender.  In college, I provided education and counseling to students seeking HIV tests. I’ll never forget when they told us at our training, “We are pro-sex and pro-gay.” The idea was that it’s good for people to have sex, and it’s good for them to choose with whom to do so.  It seems obvious, right? But at the time, I was just starting to learn the meaning of sex positivity. Then, as a counselor, I heard people’s stories. I am so grateful to all of them for showing me that window into their lived experiences. What I heard from them solidified my desire to do prevention work, to focus on education, and to get it started at as early an age as possible.

These experiences shaped my current work, which is about promoting positive possibilities for adolescent sexuality development. I’m thinking about what positive sexuality development in adolescence could look like—what are the key elements? What people, institutions, and experiences could or should be involved? How can we, as a society, prioritize healthy sexuality, and what steps can we take to make positive change?

You are now working towards a degree in Applied Child Development.  What was behind your decision to work on sex education from that perspective?

I didn’t always expect to go the academic route. After college, all I wanted to do was teach. I taught health and sexuality education at a middle school in a city near Boston. I loved lesson planning, and I adored my students. I wanted more time to hone my sex ed lessons and weave them into a great curriculum. But the debate around abstinence-only versus comprehensive sex education has all but stifled more nuanced conversation about differing visions for “comprehensive” sex ed. I want to do cutting-edge work, and I felt the need to spend time developing my own knowledge and skills about adolescent development and adolescents’ lives in all their wondrous complexity.

Studying in an applied department was really important to me. To me, sex and sexuality are lusciously personal aspects of our lives that reveal how utterly politicized our world is. Human sexuality is strongly shaped by socialization, prescribed by patriarchy and fought for through generations of resistance. History matters. Politics matter. How we treat youth matters. Applied Child Development takes all of that into account.

I think that sexuality education and youth development can do a lot for each other. Youth development is about nourishing the strengths of diverse youth, connecting youth and adults, building life skills, and providing opportunities for leadership and civic engagement. Sex ed should be all of those things, too. I would love to see more sex ed programs built through a youth development approach. Furthermore, I think the youth development approach can be invigorated by an infusion of feminist and sex-positive values. Some of that is happening already, some of that is on its way, and some of that we need to be working on for a long time coming. I named my blog “Sex Ed Transforms” in order to play on that duality. I write about how we can transform sex ed; I also write about how sex ed can transform how we live our lives and how we run the world.

As you know, Jessica Valenti recently published The Purity Myth, a book which exposed some pretty disturbing trends in sex education (or lack thereof!) nationwide.  She also talks about the lack of a comprehensive sex education standard, something that I know that you’re working on.  Can you describe your vision for such a program?

The way I think about it now, I see three essential elements to a comprehensive, medically-accurate, age-appropriate sex education program: safe space, critical analysis, and positive possibilities.

Read More »

Share on TwitterShare on TumblrSubmit to StumbleUponDigg This
Tagged , , | 1 Comment

Breaking: Supreme Court takes case on affirmative action in higher education

Share on TwitterShare on TumblrSubmit to StumbleUponDigg This

NYT reports:

Supreme Court on Tuesday agreed to hear a major case on affirmative action in higher education, adding another potential blockbuster to a docket already studded with them.

The court’s decision in the new case holds the potential to undo an accommodation reached in the Supreme Court’s 5-to-4 decision in 2003 in Grutter v. Bollinger: that public colleges and universities could not use a point system to boost minority enrollment but could take race into account in vaguer way to ensure academic diversity.

Justice Sandra Day O’Connor, who wrote the majority opinion in Grutter, said the accommodation was meant to last 25 years.

The court’s membership has changed since 2003, most notably for these purposes with the appointment of Justice Samuel A. Alito Jr., who replaced Justice O’Connor in 2006. Justice Alito has voted with the court’s more conservative justices in decisions hostile to the use of racial classifications by the government.

In other words, the outcome of this case could be very significant. Additionally, Justice Elena Kagan has recused herself, likely because she may have been involved in some aspect of the case while solicitor general.

More to come on this.

Share on TwitterShare on TumblrSubmit to StumbleUponDigg This
Tagged , , | Leave a comment

Virginia transvaginal ultrasound bill delayed after a thousand protest outside capitol

Share on TwitterShare on TumblrSubmit to StumbleUponDigg This

After a thousand people stood arm in arm outside of the Virginia state capitol in protest yesterday, the legislature decided to delay a vote on the highly controversial state-sanctioned rape bill that would require doctors to perform a medically unnecessary transvaginal ultrasound on individuals seeking an abortion.

This comes after a poll was just released revealed that 55% of voters in Virginia oppose the bill. Meanwhile, Gov. McDonnell’s spokesperson recently gave some indication the governor may be backing away from the bill (after previously saying it was a sure thing). But I’m not convinced of anything until this bill is good and dead, which it certainly is not. Not yet, at least.

And in the meantime, we find that Republicans are currently pushing a similar bill to Virginia’s in Pennsylvania.

It seems that 2011′s abysmal year of abortion restrictions is giving anti-choice legislators the confidence to take the heinousness up a notch in 2012 — between “personhood” bills and now state-mandated sexual assault (all on top of the birth control debacle), true colors can’t get any clearer to voters. And as you can see in the pic above, I think — I hope — it’s waking people up.

Pic via, thx to Jessica.

Share on TwitterShare on TumblrSubmit to StumbleUponDigg This
Tagged , , , | 2 Comments

Clinton says “culture” is no excuse for female genital mutilation

Share on TwitterShare on TumblrSubmit to StumbleUponDigg This

At the first State Department event marking the International Day of Zero Tolerance to Female Genital Mutilation, Secretary of State Hillary Clinton said Thursday that there is no cultural justification for female genital mutilation/cutting.

A couple of weeks ago, I reported on a new UN report, which found that FGM/C is on the decline in Africa. This conversation always elicits complicated arguments about cultural sovereignty and in her remarks, Secretary Clinton came down on one side of the issue.

“We cannot excuse this as a cultural tradition.  There are many cultural traditions that used to exist in many parts of the world that are no longer acceptable.  We cannot excuse it as a private matter because it has very broad public implications.  It has no medical benefits.  It is, plain and simply, a human rights violation”

Importantly, UN leaders pointed out that this is an issue beyond Africa, as well. Nafissatou Diop, Director of the United Nations Population Fund and UNICEF joint program against female genital mutilation, informed the day’s attendees that FGM/C is not limited to the African continent – the Middle East, Colombia, Indonesia, the Philippines , Northern Iraq and in some of the immigrant communities in Western European countries.

Zeinab Eyega, the Executive Director of the Sauti Yetu Center for African Women in New York City,  addressed the question of immigration:

“We can’t assume that because they have emigrated, they have brought the same social norms here.  How do parents make decisions about marriage?  What is the transnational connection between here and back home, and how is the information being shared?  Dialogue about what values and social norms do they want to continue and which ones do they want to let go?”

At the State Department event, Clinton said the Obama administration is joining the University of Nairobi to establish a Pan-African Center of Excellence to advance African strategies to address female genital cutting.  It will focus on developing local solutions and to offer medical training on how to support women who have experienced it.

According to Secretary Clinton, there are many cultural traditions around the world that we should respect — but this isn’t one of them. I think she’s right – using cultural or national sovereignty to obfuscate human rights violations happens in every country all over the world, and we’re not going to take it anymore. I think perhaps this lens should be turned upon the US as well: death penalty, anyone?

Share on TwitterShare on TumblrSubmit to StumbleUponDigg This
5 Comments
  • Subscribe


  • blog advertising is good for you.
  • Subscribe

  • Meet Us

167 queries. 1.554 seconds