Undercover audio of Texas anti-choice training session shows how the movement relies on intimidation and harassment

As anti-choice legislation is increasingly wrapped in the friendly (and dishonest) guise of “patient safety” and anti-choice protestors carefully attempt to rebrand themselves as “sidewalk counselors,” it may be easy for some to forget that harassment and intimidation still play a vital role in the anti-choice movement’s overall strategy.

But NARAL Pro-Choice Texas and Progress Texas have released this undercover audio of a training session hosted by several anti-choice groups at the Texas state capitol earlier this month which shows that, behind closed doors, they’re very upfront about their goal — “keeping abortion facilities closed” — and tactics, which include tracking license plates and physical descriptions of providers and patients, intimidating women into canceling their appointments, and searching tax records to find new clinic locations and keep doctors “on the run.” 

You’ll recall that the Supreme Court recently bought the argument that folks like this “lining the sidewalk” in front of clinics are simply peaceful “sidewalk counselors” whose right to free speech dare not be inconvenienced in the slightest. But as Karen Garnett, executive director of the Texas Pro-life Committee of North Texas, makes clear in the recording, these counselors are probably happiest when they don’t even have to say a word. She praises all the “cancelled appointments” that occur “just because [patients] don’t want to drive in because they see our presence there.” That’s a deliberate strategy of intimidation, pure and simple. And as the video notes, it’s a dangerous one; one woman was so scared of the protestors outside Planned Parenthood, she decided to go to Kermit Gosnell’s house of horrors instead.

And that’s what’s most maddening to me. I’m so fucking tired of this compassionate pro-lifer just concerned about women bullshit. If anti-choicers want to use every morally bankrupt tactic they legally can — from such “counseling” to outright trickery — to block access to abortion, fine. (In fact, if they really, truly believe abortion is murder, I’d expect nothing less, but then again, they clearly don’t actually.) But you don’t get to do that and then turn around and justify anti-choice restrictions by claiming you’re just concerned about “women’s health.” This training session happened just as the trial against Texas’ omnibus anti-abortion law began. These groups lobbied lawmakers to pass a law that could ultimately leave only six clinics in the whole state, and now they’re trying to get the rest closed — or inaccessible — through intimidation. And as NARAL Pro-Choice Texas’s Heather Busby says, “With fewer clinics for these stalking protestors to target, the dangerous impact of their intimidation tactics will be exacerbated.”

And yet somehow — seemingly just by refusing to ever acknowledge it — the movement is never really forced to accept responsibility for the consequences of this strategy. In the training session, one speaker literally praised God for the fact that upon finding out the clinic in their area is going to close, low-income women — or the “the poorer ones,” in her words — are visiting an anti-choice crisis pregnancy center instead because they don’t have transportation to go elsewhere. Translated from pro-life-speak to what that actually means: Poor women who wanted abortions were forced to accept some prenatal vitamins instead and likely slide further into poverty. Others, of course, will turn to illegal and less safe means to self-induce abortions, just like women have done forever and continue to do wherever the procedure is outlawed.

In any case — whether they are forced to carry unwanted pregnancies to term, forced to take unnecessary risks to end them, or forced to walk through a gauntlet of harassment to get a legal, constitutionally protected procedure — the anti-choice movement’s strategy causes direct harm to pregnant people. And they shouldn’t be allowed to somehow elide that fact.

Maya DusenberyMaya Dusenbery is an Executive Director of Feministing.

Atlanta, GA

Maya Dusenbery is an Executive Director in charge of Editorial at Feministing. Maya has previously worked at NARAL Pro-Choice New York and the National Institute for Reproductive Health and was a fellow at Mother Jones magazine. She graduated with a B.A. from Carleton College in 2008. A Minnesota native, she currently lives, writes, edits, and bakes bread in Atlanta, Georgia.

Maya Dusenbery is an Executive Director of Feministing in charge of Editorial.

Read more about Maya

Join the Conversation

Comments are closed.

screenshot of ship from Vessel

Watch the new doc on one doctor’s quest to offer safe abortion where it’s illegal

The new documentary Vessel tells the story of Women on Waves, founded by Dutch doctor Rebecca Gomperts who sailed the world in an “abortion ship,” offering off-shore medical abortions in the international waters surrounding countries where abortion is outlawed. Her project eventually morphed into Women on Web, which does great, life-saving work by sending abortion pills by mail to people lacking legal access. The film has opened in NYC, and is now available for streaming on iTunes.

Also, be sure to check out this interview with director/producer Diana Whitten on the Community site. As she notes, the story, unfortunately, holds particular relevance in the US today. “Due to recent legislative attacks on reproductive healthcare, the situation for U.S. women in many ...

The new documentary Vessel tells the story of Women on Waves, founded by Dutch doctor Rebecca Gomperts who sailed the world in an “abortion ship,” offering off-shore medical abortions in the international waters surrounding countries where abortion is ...

last-four-years-231-restrictions-490

Chart of the Day: Over 200 new anti-choice state laws enacted in the last 4 years

Well, we knew 2013 was bad. And 2012 was almost as bad. And 2011 was actually the worst ever. So it’s no surprise that Guttmacher’s latest tally of state abortion restrictions shows that 231 abortion restrictions have been enacted in the past four years. 

The 26 new restrictions added to the tally in 2014 was out of a total of 335 anti-choice bills that state legislatures considered (so it could totally be worse) and it’s certainly an improvement over the few years prior.

Also on the good news front: pro-choice legislators went on the offensive last year more than they have in decades. State legislators introduced 95 bills to expand access to abortion, according to Guttmacher tally. More ...

Well, we knew 2013 was bad. And 2012 was almost as bad. And 2011 was actually the worst ever. So it’s no surprise that Guttmacher’s latest tally of state ...