New Blog Alert: Where feminists talk economics

We’re thrilled to see that The Nation is launching a new roundtable blog called The Curve, “where feminists will hash out economic issues and intervene in feminist debates from an economic perspective.” The editors explain that they’ve been frustrated by two phenomena:

One is the way in which women’s voices are so frequently sidelined in economic debates. Our voices are few and far between in the economics blogosphere. It’s striking that almost none of the reviewers of Thomas Piketty’s groundbreaking Capital in the Twenty-First Centurywere women. And as Media Matters recently showed, women are rarely invited to discuss the economy on cable news.

The flipside of this problem is that, even amongst ourselves, feminists don’t talk enough about economics. Too often, discussions about so-called culture problems like abortion access and domestic violence lack the economic context necessary to appreciate their true causes and repercussions. When topics such as the pay gap or workplace discrimination come up, coverage is often superficial and focused on the experiences of a tiny elite. Meanwhile, the economic pressures on women are mounting: as inequality soars, women make up a growing proportion of the long-term unemployed, low-income women lead a growing majority of single-mother households, middle-income women struggle with few social supports, and even the progress being made by high-income women into the executive suites remains glacially slow.

In the first installment, host Kathleen Geier and some other smart folks discuss “lean in,” the class divide within the feminist movement, and how the barriers to gender equality “are embedded in the workings of American capitalism.” Next time, they’ll consider whether the Democratic Party’s ties to corporate America hamper its ability to deliver on feminist goals. Can’t wait!

The Academic Feminist: Lady Economists in Conversation
What if we all leaned out, instead of leaning in?
Feministing Chat: Ban Bossy?

Atlanta, GA

Maya Dusenbery is an Executive Director in charge of Editorial at Feministing. Maya has previously worked at NARAL Pro-Choice New York and the National Institute for Reproductive Health and was a fellow at Mother Jones magazine. She graduated with a B.A. from Carleton College in 2008. A Minnesota native, she currently lives, writes, edits, and bakes bread in Atlanta, Georgia.

Maya Dusenbery is an Executive Director of Feministing in charge of Editorial.

Read more about Maya

Join the Conversation

  • rocinante3d

    The problems of low income women, long term unemployment for women are not insoluble. The biggest issue plaguing women and men are regulations.

    The best example is Uber – the ride sharing service. You can rent out your car to someone for an hour, a day whatever you feel like you can provide. It gives you the ability to earn extra income with your car. It doesn’t matter whether you are male or female.

    Unfortunately, its not legal in several states because there are not enough opportunities to get kickbacks and bribes. Government has captured a market which it “regulates” to get money. There are many such regulated industries ((hairdressers, florists and just about anything that “serves the public good.” ) Regulators love to wrap themselves in serving the public good.

    It absolutely amazes me that feminists should be stridently calling for a free market and yet refuse to do so. More than anything the ability to make money free and unfettered from stupid ass regulations ought to be compellingly clear to anyone yet the solution is to always call for more regulations to recognize feminist goals.

    The free market treats everyone equally and that is as feminist as you can get.