GOPers defend reality TV homophobe, are confused about First Amendment

Texas Senator Ted Cruz with his finger raised

I don’t think Senator Cruz understands free speech.

So apparently there is a reality television show called Duck Dynasty, and one of the stars was suspended from the program for saying something homophobic. So naturally, the GOP is running to defend him. Wait what?

Yes, folks, for real.

Sarah Palin expressed solidarity with one of the stars of the television show “Duck Dynasty” after he was suspended from the program for making anti-gay comments.

Palin said reality TV star Phil Robertson was only voicing his personal opinions, adding that “free speech is an endangered species.”

“Those ‘intolerants’ hatin’ and taking on the Duck Dynasty patriarch for voicing his personal opinion are taking on all of us,” the former Alaska governor wrote in a Facebook post Wednesday night.

Louisiana Gov. Bobby Jindal (R) said he found many of Robertson’s remarks offensive but said people are entitled to express their own views. The “Dynasty” family lives in Louisiana.

Texas Senator Ted Cruz also joined in the fun, saying that anyone who believes in free speech should be “deeply dismayed.” Which brings me to only one conclusion: I’m not sure that these folks know what the first amendment and free speech actually mean? Yes, you are allowed to express your opinions, however unpopular. No one’s gonna arrest Mr. Duck Dynasty for being a homophobe. But just because you can say whatever you want, doesn’t mean that there will literally be no consequences to saying super hateful shit. I actually wonder if these folks understand this, or if other maybe less idiotic Republicans (do they exist?) are embarrassed by these folks complete failure to grasp this basic concept. Shit, I’m embarrassed for them.

1bfea3e7449eff65a94e2e55a8b7acda-bpfullVerónica mostly sticks to Love & Hip Hop and Hoarders when she’s watching reality TV.

and tagged , . Bookmark the permalink. Both comments and trackbacks are currently closed.

3 Comments

  1. Posted December 19, 2013 at 2:50 pm | Permalink

    “Yes, you are allowed to express your opinions, however unpopular. No one’s gonna arrest Mr. Duck Dynasty for being a homophobe. But just because you can say whatever you want, doesn’t mean that there will literally be no consequences to saying super hateful shit.”

    THANK YOU. The First Ammendment prohibits LAWS against exercising free speech. It does not prohibit a private company from firing its employees. Yes, there are laws prohibiting employers from discriminating against employees, but homophobes are not a protected class.

    They can’t even claim that this is discrimination for his “political affiliation” because even if we all know that a certain major political party opposes gay rights (e.g., opposing same-sex marriage), no party openly claims that homosexuality is “a sin” as part of its platform.

  2. Posted December 19, 2013 at 6:41 pm | Permalink

    People don’t seem to grasp that Phil Robertson was almost definitely contractually obligated to not make a PR scene for A&E, lest he was willing to risk being terminated. They wouldn’t have been able to let him go so easily otherwise.
    Those contracts are drawn up and agreed on with the goal of protecting both parties, and A&E isn’t affiliated with the government, sooo… kind of confused by how the first amendment keeps being brought into this.

  3. Posted December 19, 2013 at 8:40 pm | Permalink

    Now keep in mind that law school is a distant memory for me, but I seem to recall that the Bill of Rights protects you from the government. The DOJ can’t stop you from saying stupid hateful racist homophobic shit, but A&E sure can fire you for doing so. And they did – took away this guy’s megaphone. Of course the right wing will hand him another one ….

Feministing In Your Inbox

Sign up for our Newsletter to stay in touch with Feministing
and receive regular updates and exclusive content.

169 queries. 0.643 seconds