Want an RU 486 pill? That will be two forced trans-vaginal ultrasounds, please.

RU 486 is a non-surgical early abortion medication that comes in the form of a pill and is generally used to end a pregnancy up to 10 weeks from a woman’s last period. So, naturally, a bill, approved by Indiana’s state Senate Health and Provider Services Committee on Wednesday, would require clinics to conduct trans-vaginal ultrasounds on women both before and after dispensing the pill.  Senate Bill 371 passed by a vote of 7 to 5, and will next be voted on by the full state Senate. Specifically, the bill would require women to be presented with the sound and image of the fetal heartbeat before the abortion and to return for another ultrasound to ensure that she is no longer pregnant.

The bill makes no medical sense, whatsoever, and is a clear attempt to discourage women from taking RU 486, by adding two unnecessary trips to an abortion clinic and two unnecessary uncomfortable procedures to it. Dr. Anne Davis, the consulting medical director for Physicians for Reproductive Health, explained,

“[a woman who has taken RU 486] can do a blood test at any local facility after an abortion to show that the hormone levels are going down as they should, there’s no medical reason to make her drive back to the abortion clinic and go through another ultrasound…. This is yet another onerous, medically unnecessary barrier.”

Davis also pointed out that, like so many things in life, it puts a disproportionate burden on poorer women, who have to come up with the access and money for transportation, possible childcare and possibly miss work to get to the clinic.

But the bill makes total sense, when you look at it in the right distorting and blinding light. Sue Swayze, the legislative director of Indiana Right to Life, thinks the forced trans-vaginal ultra sounds are totes kosher and any arguments against them are just stupid. As she explains,

I got pregnant vaginally…. Something else could come in my vagina for a medical test that wouldn’t be that intrusive to me. So I find that argument a little ridiculous.

Consensual sex, forced probing with a foreign object, same thing! This lady must have a great sex life.

Also, check out Rachel Maddow’s excellent take-down of the bill here. No transcript available yet but I will update if I find one.

and tagged , , , , . Bookmark the permalink. Both comments and trackbacks are currently closed.


  1. Posted February 22, 2013 at 4:55 pm | Permalink

    Sue Swayze — Wow! Stupidity really has no bottom…

  2. Posted February 23, 2013 at 1:08 am | Permalink

    It is very difficult to try and extend any empathy towards Sue Swayze for her comment, “I got pregnant vaginally…. Something else could come in my vagina for a medical test that wouldn’t be that intrusive to me. So I find that argument a little ridiculous.”

    But I shall try, because here clearly is a woman needs a lot of acceptance and patience, because she clearly does not think of her body as her own sacred, private space. She does not respect or love herself. She thinks so ill of her sex that she would readily compare it to a trans-vaginal probing.

    But goddamn, it is so much easier to feel loathing than compassion here.

  3. Posted February 23, 2013 at 12:45 pm | Permalink

    What if she doesn’t go back for the second on? Are they going to re-impregnate her?

Feministing In Your Inbox

Sign up for our Newsletter to stay in touch with Feministing
and receive regular updates and exclusive content.

170 queries. 0.633 seconds