A thank you note for Todd Akin

I’m a pretty even-keeled kind of gal. I don’t lose my temper that easily. I’ll get irritated, sure, and sometimes that irritation will get vented, a little bit at a time, in the form of passive aggression. But I’m not one for big blow ups. I can’t remember the last time I raised my voice in anger.

I’m also a proponent of civility in public discourse. I think that reasonable people can disagree, and that they should do it politely. I think that if you’re going to argue with someone, you should attack their ideas, not their character. I think a step-by-step take-down of someone’s ideas is more productive than just calling them an asshole. Even when someone’s ideas make me roll my eyes, or drop my jaw in disbelief, I try my best to be civil and respectful. I don’t particularly enjoy being called stupid, or evil, or ugly, in the public square, and because I believe in treating other people the way you want to be treated, I don’t generally engage in ad hominem attacks.

That said, it’s taking all my self-control to say “thank you,” to Missouri Representative Todd Akin. Thank you, not fuck you.

For those of you who missed it over the weekend, Rep. Akin, who is running for Senate against the incumbent Democrat Claire McCaskill, was asked whether or not he believed abortion should be legal in the case of rape or incest. He said:

Well you know, people always want to try to make that as one of those things, well how do you, how do you slice this particularly tough sort of ethical question. First of all, from what I understand from doctors, that’s really rare. If it’s a legitimate rape, the female body has ways to try to shut that whole thing down.

But let’s assume that maybe that didn’t work or something. I think there should be some punishment, but the punishment ought to be on the rapist and not attacking the child.

I want to thank Mr. Akin for his remarks.

I want to thank him for demonstrating that the anti-choice movement is so often divorced from scientific facts, like when they claim that the uterus contains a magical anti-rapist semen force field, or when they claim that there’s a causal relationship between abortion and breast cancer. It is not, in fact, “really rare” for rape to result in pregnancy, unless you think that something that happens 32, 000 times every year is “really rare.”

I also want to thank him for revealing the contempt and mistrust that lies at the heart of so much anti-choice rhetoric. The contempt for women who have sex for pleasure and accidentally get pregnant. The mistrust of women that feeds the belief that we lie about being raped so we can get abortions, and the mistrust of women that justifies the idea that we don’t know when we’ve been raped and that politicians get to decide that for us.

I want to thank him for demonstrating the complete disregard for women that is necessary for a person to want to ban abortion. Notice that in his response, he mentioned the hypothetical rapist, and the “child,” but he didn’t mention the woman. The woman who has been raped and is now pregnant and will now be forced to give birth to her rapist’s baby because the government says so. Because what she wants isn’t relevant in this situation.

I want to thank Mr. Akin for highlighting the logical inconsistency of being anti-choice and anti-Affordable Care Act. You’ll rail all day long about how Obamacare infringes on the American citizen’s personal freedom to make healthcare decisions, but you’re happy to infringe on an American woman’s personal freedom to make reproductive healthcare decisions? How exactly do you hold both those ideas in your head without your head exploding?

I want to thank Mr. Akin for making it perfectly clear just how extreme and how anti-women the reproductive rights conversation has become in America. Opposition to rape and incest exceptions used to be a fringe position. Even the most proudly pro-life politicians would say that there should be an exception for rape, incest, and life of the mother. I don’t personally think a woman should have to prove she’s been raped before the government will let her make a private healthcare decision, but whatever, that’s where the dial used to be. The dial has moved now. People like Mr. Akin are now free to publicly state that they think the government should be able to force a teenage girl to give birth to her father’s baby. They get to say things like that out loud, because of how far right the dial has moved. Sure, they’ll later say they “misspoke” and got the facts wrong about the non-existent magical qualities of the mystical feminine crotchflower, but they won’t back down on that whole forcing-rape-survivors-to-give-birth thing.

For all this, Mr. Akin, I say thank you. Thank you for your illuminating comments, for making it clear to people who didn’t already realize that the anti-choice movement is about controlling women, about punishing them for being sexual beings, and treating them as less than full citizens. Thank you for – probably – driving tens of thousands of people into the waiting, welcoming arms of feminism and the pro-choice movement. Thank –

– OK, you know what, screw this. I’m all for civility. I’m all for treating other people the way you want to be treated. Ideas, not ad hominem attacks, all the way. But Mr. Akin, I believe, has forfeited his right to my civility. By publicly suggesting that I’m too stupid to know whether or not I’ve been raped, and that if I am raped and I get pregnant, I should still have to give birth but don’t worry the rapist will get a slap on the wrist, he has broken my resolve to treat others with the respect with which I would want to be treated. And if I ever say something as awful, as inhumane, as ignorant as what Mr. Akin said over the weekend, I don’t want people to be civil. I want them to respond exactly as I’m about to.

Fuck you.

Wow, OK, that is pretty uncivil. What I should probably say instead is, fuck you sir.

and tagged , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink. Both comments and trackbacks are currently closed.

10 Comments

  1. Posted August 20, 2012 at 9:38 am | Permalink

    If it’s written into any law somewhere that a pregnancy can not be the result of rape, even in some obscure medical legality, than defense lawyers for rapists are going to jump all over that. Rapists will be acquitted because they got their victim pregnant. Suddenly, the goal of the rapist will be to get the victim pregnant so that they can’t be convicted.

  2. Posted August 20, 2012 at 10:11 am | Permalink

    Thank you for this.

    I’d also like to thank Akin for forcing Romney to reveal just how cowardly and anti-woman he really is. All Romney did in response to Akin’s comments was DISAGREE?

    There is no DISAGREEMENT. This is not a matter of OPINION. This is FACT, SCIENCE, and HISTORY. Women’s reproductive capacities are not affected by the presence or absence of their consent. A fact that many women I have worked with know intimately, and that most slave owners exploited pre-emancipation.

  3. Posted August 20, 2012 at 10:36 am | Permalink
  4. Posted August 20, 2012 at 12:13 pm | Permalink

    I think we’re all in agreement that what Todd Akin said was ignorant and hateful, and that he has hopefully demonstrated to all the voters in his state that they should eject him from political office ASAP. However, I do want to comment on this idea that we always need to be polite in political discourse. There are two different issues here: attacking a person’s ideas vs. attacking a person, and being nice vs. nasty.

    I’m an academic. I make my living criticizing other people’s ideas, so I am 100% on board with the idea that ad hominem attacks are unnecessary and unproductive in political discourse.

    But as much as it sounds like a good idea that we should always be “nice” and “polite” when talking politics, in practice this is often a way of silencing women. Social-psych experiments STILL show (in the year 2012!!) that women are judged more harshly than men for the same behaviours; a man speaking with conviction is “assertive” but a woman speaking in the same tone of voice is “shrill” or “hysterical.” So requiring “niceness” for political participation means that women are rebuked or silenced more often than men, and do not get to participate as fully as men do.

    This doesn’t mean that “anything goes” in political discussion. I’ve seen some womderful, rational, well thought out arguments against someone’s position (not the person), that are delivered with venom, sarcasm, or anger (Melissa McEwan at Shakesville writes these kinds of arguments all the time, for example).

    But the last part of your post hits the nail on the head. People like Todd Akin want to legislate away our bodily autonomy, and show a fundamental lack of respect for us as human beings, and then expect us to be “nice” and “civil” to them in return? That is adding insult to injury (or in this case, the sexist icing on the sexist cake).

    • Posted August 20, 2012 at 11:28 pm | Permalink

      Amen…I was gonna say the same thing.

      Great response to Akin, but don’t worry about the “sir” at the end! Let it rip, girl, he deserves it to hear it, and we all deserve to say it.

  5. Posted August 20, 2012 at 10:13 pm | Permalink

    Thank you. As someone who still, hope against hope, harbors libertarian feminist sentiments, thank you. There is NOTHING libertarian left in that Republican party. For all the reasons you said, especially the idea that these idiots think paying a tax is somehow more f an infringement that BEARING A CHILD – thank you. They have clearly never borne a child. I have. And what they are trying to do is a form of fascism.

  6. Posted August 21, 2012 at 12:09 am | Permalink

    Dear male Republican politicians:
    I don’t pretend to know more about your penis than you, don’t pretend you know more about my vagina than I do.
    Trust me, I WISH I could shut down my fallopian tubes when I’ve been raped. Or hell, until I’m 27.

    If you can’t say it OR understand it, DON’T LEGISLATE IT.

  7. Posted August 21, 2012 at 1:30 pm | Permalink

    Thank you, thank you, THANK YOU for your beautifully and thoughtfully written take on the Akin debacle. My partner takes a similar stance–”Let ‘em keep digging holes for themselves. Let ‘em keep showing us what they’re REALLY made of.” I also appreciate the thoughtful comments. Wow–some sanity on the internet! Happy to have found you all!

  8. Posted August 22, 2012 at 5:11 pm | Permalink

    Thank you so much for your thank you. Absolutely perfect. Please take a moment to read; share if you like:
    http://ekchelimsky.tumblr.com/post/29946954284/a-letter-to-congressman-akin

  9. Posted August 23, 2012 at 6:07 am | Permalink

    Well, I felt compelled to register and comment.

    This clown has confused women’s reproductive organs with those of ducks; a very easy mistake to make for someone of his ilk. Female ducks can reroute their vagina if it’s got sperm in from a duck she doesn’t want to have ducklings with, kind of create a dead end. Amazing, right? Like I said, an easy mistake to make ;)

    But nowhere near as amazing as the sheer ignorance displayed by the people in power in your country (and mine, I ain’t having a shot!). Roe v Wade is one of the most important pieces of legislation in the world.

    I’ve had an abortion and I have this advice for everyone: If you don’t want an abortion, don’t have one. And kindly shut the fuck up and let us that do get on with it.

    Thank you.

Feministing In Your Inbox

Sign up for our Newsletter to stay in touch with Feministing
and receive regular updates and exclusive content.

212 queries. 0.635 seconds