Mitt Romney has taken flak for being a flip-flopper on abortion rights from both sides. Early in his career in Massachusetts, he believed that, despite his own personal opposition, abortion should be “safe and legal.” In a 1994 debate he explained his view by revealing that a close relative of his had died from an illegal abortion.
Transcript after the jump.
Yesterday, Salon reported that Romney’s relative was a 21-year-old named Ann Keenan. The sister of Romney’s brother-in-law, Keenan died in 1963 from an infection following what her death certificate described as a “septic criminal recent abortion.” Her parents directed that “Memorial tributes may be sent to the Planned Parenthood Association.” Although many of the details of Keenan’s death are unknown, the story offers a terrible reminder of the risks women were forced to take before Roe v. Wade.
It’s no wonder that being touched by that horror first-hand would make Romney “see that regardless of one’s beliefs about choice, that you would hope it would be safe and legal.” And yet–times have changed.
In 1994, Romney and his wife attended a Planned Parenthood fundraiser. When he ran for governor of Massachusetts in 2002 campaign, he promised to uphold the state’s abortion laws. But in 2005, with his eye on the 2008 GOP presidential nomination, he started calling himself “pro-life.” Today, Romney says that he “would cut funding to Planned Parenthood, that he opposed Roe, and that ‘abortion should be limited to only instances of rape, incest, or to save the life of the mother.’”
He’s made the entirely-reasonable and utterly-depressing political assessment that, despite the fact that the majority of Americans still support the view expressed by Romney of 1994, anti-choice extremists now control the Republican party. And a GOP presidential hopeful has to pander to them–even if it means disavowing beliefs that were once “very dear” and forgetting the harsh lessons of history.
And even if many anti-choicers will probably never be satisfied.
Interviewer: If abortion is morally wrong, aren’t you responsible for discouraging it?
Romney: One of the great things about our nation is that we are each entitled to have strong personal beliefs, and we encourage other people to do the same. But as a nation, we recognize the right of all people to believe as they want and not to impose our beliefs on other people. I believe that abortion should be “safe and legal” in this country. I have since the time that my mom took that position when she ran in 1970 as a U.S. Senate candidate. I believe that since Roe v. Wade has been the law for 20 years, we should sustain and support it. And I sustain and support that law and the right of a woman to make that choice. And my personal beliefs, like the personal beliefs of other people, should not be brought into a political campaign.
Kennedy: On the question of the choice issue, I have supported Roe v. Wade, I am pro-choice. My opponent is “multiple-choice.”
Romney: On the idea of “multiple-choice,” I have to respond. I have my own beliefs, and those beliefs are very dear to me. One of them is that I do not impose my beliefs on other people. Many, many years ago, I had a dear, close family relative that was very close to me who passed away from an illegal abortion. It is since that time that my mother and my family have been committed to the belief that we can believe as we want, but we will not force our beliefs on others on that matter. And you will not see me wavering on that or being multiple-choice.