What We Missed

Betty Ford has died. You can read about her on our Community site.

Update from New Hampshire: the Executive Council could reconsider defunding Planned Parenthood tomorrow. Here’s hoping the public reaction to the whole “not paying for your party” thing has an impact.

In the wake of the baby Storm media frenzy, a primer on gender diverse parenting.

Scandal! Michelle Obama indulges in a burger, fries, and shake. Let the illogical fat shaming food policing commence.

Some tips on choosing language to refer to folks in the sex trade. Hint: asking is good.

What’s next after same sex marriage, polygamy? Not just an anti-equality argument, actually.

and tagged . Bookmark the permalink. Both comments and trackbacks are currently closed.

9 Comments

  1. Posted July 12, 2011 at 5:52 pm | Permalink

    um, the issue with Michelle Obama is about fat shaming. It’s about pointing out perceived hypocrisy with her stance on fighting obesity and eating a high calorie, unhealthy meal. while i know one can eat poorly on occasion (say on cheat days) and still hold fast to the idea of eating well generally, pointing out her meal is fair political game and has nothing to do with fat shaming

    • Posted July 12, 2011 at 9:14 pm | Permalink

      “…pointing out her meal is fair political game”

      Uh, while I have to say I think the policies and views Michelle Obama promotes regarding food and weight are invasive and oppressive, and so criticism of her own food choices has a ring of poetic justice to it, it most certainly does not constitute any feminist idea of “fair political game.” Unless you happen to consider the way this country obsesses over and polices what women do with and put into their bodies a good thing.

      When Michelle Obama shames people for eating “poorly” (I’m not even going to touch that), it’s gross. When people shame Michelle Obama for eating “poorly”…it’s also gross.

      • Posted July 12, 2011 at 9:25 pm | Permalink

        Cosign

      • Posted July 12, 2011 at 9:40 pm | Permalink

        michelle’s policies are hardly directed at women or females generally, so i don’t see the feminist angle on this. what does the statement “Unless you happen to consider the way this country obsesses over and polices what women do with and put into their bodies a good thing” have to do with her work on getting all kids to eat well? and why is it oppressive for one to point out that having eats eat to the point they get diabetes at 16 isn’t a good thing?

    • Posted July 13, 2011 at 8:14 am | Permalink

      There is no “issue” beyond some people trying to score political points with a terrible argument that would not convince a smart kindergartner.
      Eating a less nutritious meal on a given day has virtually no effect and doesn’t show any kind of hypocrisy if the same person has an overall healthy eating scheme going on. Just knowing they ate a burger and fries doesn’t even tell you whether they gained or lost bodyfat that day.
      Now if she was on record saying every single meal has to be nutritious or you are a bad person/parent, I’d think a little bit differently.

  2. Posted July 12, 2011 at 5:55 pm | Permalink

    i meant to say the issue with Michelle Obama is NOT about fat shaming

  3. Posted July 13, 2011 at 12:17 am | Permalink

    Once in a while you can have trans-fatty foods, my Mom was a nurse and told me this. Also: I love you Feministing Editors for linking to the article I wrote! To quote the great Sally Field: “You like me! You really like me!”

  4. Posted July 13, 2011 at 9:14 am | Permalink

    I thought this was a really interesting story as well: http://www.npr.org/2011/07/13/137681070/for-stanton-all-women-were-not-created-equal

Feministing In Your Inbox

Sign up for our Newsletter to stay in touch with Feministing
and receive regular updates and exclusive content.

182 queries. 0.512 seconds