New Hampshire defunds Planned Parenthood because it doesn’t want to pay for your “party”

Condom Party Swizzle Sticks

Mr. Wieczorek, won't you please help pay for my condom party? (Image via Amazon.)

“I am opposed to providing condoms to someone. If you want to have a party, have a party, but don’t ask me to pay for it.”

That’s New Hampshire executive councilor Raymond Wieczorek explaining why he wouldn’t support funding Planned Parenthood to offer contraception to low-income women.

After losing the $1.8 million state contract last week, six Planned Parenthood clinics in the state have been forced to stop providing contraception. One center has, so far, turned away 20-30 women seeking low-cost birth control each day. The clinic’s manager said some of the women say they will stop taking birth control altogether because they don’t have private insurance and can’t afford the higher price at pharmacies.

The fact that anti-choice advocates can get away with supporting anti-contraception policies that have the direct effect of increasing unintended pregnancies–and therefore abortions–is absurd. Even more outrageous is that, as Wieczorek’s comment illustrates, many of them have even stopped trying to pretend that this isn’t all about controlling female sexuality.

It’s hard to overstate how extreme Wieczorek’s comment is. Either he believes that not subsidizing contraception will actually result in less non-procreative sex, or he believes that women who have non-procreative sex deserve to be punished with unintended pregnancies.

Naive or cruel? Or perhaps just full of shit?

I don’t know. But I do know that the so-called “party” happens, and will continue to happen, whether or not the state of New Hampshire pays to help make it safer. Folks like Wieczorek can claim: “I am opposed to abortion. I am opposed to providing condoms to someone.” But, as a matter of policy, if you don’t support the latter, you’ll inevitably get more of the former. And if you refuse to pay for either, you’ll just end up paying for the babies.

Here’s where you can contact Mr. Wieczorek to ask him to help pay for that condom party.

and tagged , . Bookmark the permalink. Both comments and trackbacks are currently closed.

4 Comments

  1. Posted July 12, 2011 at 12:03 pm | Permalink

    Mr. Wieczorek also fails to understand, it appears, that contraception can also serve as protection. Sexually transmitted infections are communicable diseases. I doubt he opposes state funding for MMR or chicken pox vaccinations. Condoms: not just for dirty, sex-having ladies, they’re a public health tool!

  2. Posted July 12, 2011 at 1:51 pm | Permalink

    There are few things that brighten my day like a well-written message to members of the government that piss me off. Thanks for the heads up.

  3. Posted July 12, 2011 at 2:35 pm | Permalink

    Part of me wants to order a ridiculous number of condoms and send them to his Congressional office.

  4. Posted July 13, 2011 at 9:29 am | Permalink

    One would think giving out condoms to low income people is a cost effective measure to contribute towards the general health of the population.

Feministing In Your Inbox

Sign up for our Newsletter to stay in touch with Feministing
and receive regular updates and exclusive content.

173 queries. 0.492 seconds