Sarah Erdreich and Rachel Joy Larris have a fascinating, visionary post up at Abortion Gang titled “How to Better Fund A Pro-Choice Movement.” Here’s an excerpt:
The fact of the matter is that most national pro-choice organizations have very little staff in most states. There are exceptions, but in many cases, there might be only a single executive director and perhaps one or two other staff and interns to protect reproductive rights within the entire state. Of course, other organizations, such as state ACLU chapters, often devote resources to reproductive issues, but for North Dakota, South Dakota and Minnesota there is a single Planned Parenthood and a single communications director to cover all reproductive rights issues for all three states. For politicians in these states and others to feel beholden to their pro-choice constituents, more work needs to be done at organizing from the ground-up.
There is perhaps a better way of doing this than continuing to push money to the existing pro-choice organizations. After all, who better knows their state’s issues, and the concerns of their community, than the clinics themselves?
National organizations like Planned Parenthood, the National Abortion Federation, and NARAL do a tremendous job in working on the federal level, and we are not suggesting that they are delinquent at the state level. But in our experience, it is the clinics themselves that can have the most direct impact on their communities, and that best know the intricacies and restrictions of their state’s laws. It would be wonderful to see more support on this grassroots level, both of the financial and volunteer kind, to help protect and expand the work that clinics do.
Please read the full post here.
I am so excited by this idea. Serious threats to reproductive health care access, especially abortion access, get pushed through in states all the time. There’s often very little that can be done in states with overwhelmingly anti-choice legislatures. Roe v. Wade has been chipped away to the point where it’s barely the law of the land in large swaths of the country. We need state based strategy, not just organizing at the federal level.
And I love the idea of trusting in the leadership of direct service providers. They know best what the threats are and what they need to be able to provide the best reproductive health care to the people they serve.
I’m curious to hear reactions from clinic staff and directors. They’re certainly swamped with the work they’re doing already, but what would it mean if they had the funding and resources to do political organizing better? Because it’s very true they’re doing this work already anyway.
I’m so inspired to see this sort of visioning happening around ways to do pro-choice politics better. I think we’re moving in a really exciting direction.
Pro-choice orgs won’t get rewarded for rolling over
In budget fight, pro-choice organizations get played again
Are there alternatives to the failing national reproductive rights organizing model?