Assange ordered back to Sweden

Julian AssangeA British judge ruled today that Julian Assange should be extradited to Sweden to face sexual assault allegations. The Wikileaks founder’s lawyers said they would appeal the ruling.

Judge Howard Riddle dismissed Assange’s arguments, which sound a lot like media hype, including that Assange would then be extradited to the U.S. where he might be executed. His lawyers also claimed the charges would not amount to rape in other European countries. I’m glad to have a legal ruling saying that’s not the case.

We’ve said it over and over again – you can recognize the politics behind the sexual assault charges against Assange, while also recognizing it’s a good thing that sexual assault charges are being taken seriously. Assange has turned this whole situation into a media circus to try to keep himself out of a Swedish jail. He certainly doesn’t seem to care about what all this negative attention means to the two women who have been so regularly insulted in the press and courts of multiple countries.

and tagged , . Bookmark the permalink. Both comments and trackbacks are currently closed.


  1. Posted February 24, 2011 at 9:29 pm | Permalink

    It was the women who sought to publicly discredit Assange after discovering he had (consensual) sexual relations with both. We would all agree that it’s quite strange to hold a party for a man and allow him to bunk at your apartment AFTER the alleged incident occurred (which is considered illegal based on a draconian law that requires sex with a condom).

    Julian has done just about everything he could do to cooperate with the authorities, and it was only after he left Sweden that the arrest warrant via Interpol was issued (how many so-called rapists who have consensual sex without a condom are pursued by the European investigative task force? Not many).

    This is a highly politically-charged smear campaign from two women who have felt betrayed and an over-ambitious prosecutor seeking to make a name for herself.

    • Posted February 25, 2011 at 6:26 pm | Permalink

      There is no law in Sweden about not being allowed to have sex without a condom, nor is there a law about “surprise sex”. The women who pressed charges against him alleged that he initiated sex while one of them was asleep, and that he held down one of them when she said no, in addition to one of them requesting a condom and him saying he was wearing one when he wasn’t.

      Please don’t keep blatantly lying about the above when those lies have been discredited time and time again.

      Also, the women who pressed charges were left wing activists. Why would left-wing activists be politically against Wikileaks? It’s the media that has turned it into a smear campaign, not the accusers. We can definitely all agree that a regular man who had been accused of these things would not been as aggressively pursued by the media (though they should!), but that isn’t the women’s fault. Just because Assange’s political opponents have tried to use the accusations to discredit his work (as though anti-censorship politics has anything to do with his personal character and possible crimes) doesn’t mean he didn’t commit them.

      All that’s happening now is that he will be prosecuted. Good. That is what should happen. All people accused of these crimes should be prosecuted. He wasn’t sent directly to jail.

  2. Posted February 25, 2011 at 8:46 am | Permalink

    I think it’s quite surprising that he’s claiming the Swedes will send him to the US but we (the UK) won’t. Um, the UK’s extradition arrangements with the US basically amount to “roll over and do what we are told” the Swedish ones… not so much.

    • Posted February 25, 2011 at 2:13 pm | Permalink

      I think it’s quite surprising that he’s claiming the Swedes will send him to the US but we (the UK) won’t.

      Wait, do you actually know the extradition treaties between US and England versus US and Sweden? Or are you just pulling that out of your opinion hole?

      Assange should get the same day in court as every other American/English/Swede, but I’d rather not see a bait-and-switch where he’s brought up on charges in Sweden, dragged back home, immediately acquitted, and then immediately re-arrested on some US bullshit charge.

      Maybe he’s a criminal sexy-by-surpriser who also runs a red hot news leaking website. Maybe he’s a victim of shinanigans. But I’m willing to give him the legal advantage, because Julian Assange wasn’t the one running a network of secret torture holding pens for political dissidents and alleged terrorists these last ten years.

      If you’re pissed at the situation, blame good old America. We’re the ones that blew the trust of the international community and made Julian’s protestations seem so incredibly plausible.

  3. Posted February 25, 2011 at 4:31 pm | Permalink

    The U.S. has repeatedly, undeniably been as asshole to foreigners. Assange has repeatedly, undeniably been an asshole to women. Shouldn’t they both be punished? I don’t really see it as an either/or scenario.

  4. Posted March 6, 2011 at 3:43 pm | Permalink

    “He certainly doesn’t seem to care about what all this negative attention means to the two women who have been so regularly insulted in the press and courts of multiple countries.”

    No shit. He’s facing jail, they’re facing… insults? His heart bleeds for them, I’m sure. If he turns out to be guilty, than fuck him, hope he rots in jail. If he’s not guilty, though, how can you blame him for doing everything he can to prove his innocence?

Feministing In Your Inbox

Sign up for our Newsletter to stay in touch with Feministing
and receive regular updates and exclusive content.

175 queries. 0.873 seconds