Hyde: The Status Quo Is Not O.K.

Guest Post from Karen Leiter, Human Rights Researcher for the Center for Reproductive Rights.

About a year ago, I began researching a report for the Center for Reproductive Rights on the damaging impact of the Hyde Amendment. Hyde has blocked federal Medicaid funding for abortions for 34 years, preventing more than a million poor women from exercising their reproductive rights.

The Center wanted to get the real stories of women affected by Hyde so we joined with the National Network of Abortion Funds to interview women across the country personally affected by this dangerous policy.

Today, we’ve released the report, WHOSE CHOICE? How the Hyde Amendment Harms Poor Women, and a short video laying out 34 years of Hyde’s negative impact on women.

Hyde: The Status Quo Is Not OK from Center for Reproductive Rights on Vimeo.

One story in the report comes from a disabled veteran of the Iraq war struggling as a single mother. While trying to raise the necessary funds, she was forced to delay her abortion for more than six weeks and had to cancel several appointments—all while the cost of the procedure continued to increase.

We also hear from a mother of three who lost her job while pregnant, and said she knew she “couldn’t afford a baby” given her financial circumstances but had “mixed feelings” about getting an abortion. In addition to borrowing money from her sisters and receiving assistance from an abortion fund, she had to delay paying some of her bills in order to pay for her abortion.

These stories of financial and emotional hardship are heartbreaking. Moreover, even women who should qualify for an abortion under Hyde’s very limited exceptions often struggle to obtain coverage and are denied funding.

This is only a snapshot of the harm inflicted by Hyde, which will likely be expanded if anti-choice members of Congress have their way. Right now, a bill introduced by Rep. Chris Smith (R-NJ) is quietly circulating through Congress seeking to permanently ban all federal funding for abortions. But that’s not where it stops. The “No Taxpayer Funding for Abortion Act” also effectively eliminates abortion coverage in the private insurance market nationwide and could undermine women’s access to life-saving emergency abortions at state and local public hospitals.

This bill already has more than 170 co-sponsors and is picking up traction in the House. We need to stop its progress immediately. You can taking action today.

Thank you,
Karen Leiter
Human Rights Researcher for the Center for Reproductive Rights

and tagged , , , . Bookmark the permalink. Both comments and trackbacks are currently closed.

2 Comments

  1. Posted September 17, 2010 at 7:00 pm | Permalink

    Damn. That was a good episode of “Mad Men.” What poor Joan has to put up with at work and at home, sheesh, assholes everywhere. Oh and that Joey definitely has a shitload of mommy issues, comparing his mom to Joan and saying that they’re sluts.

  2. Posted September 18, 2010 at 4:49 am | Permalink

    Faye and Don’s date

    I didn’t find this hot, I found it sort of patronising. Fay is a woman who’s clearly capable of making her own decisions, probably also when it comes to sex. Of couse I realise the reason why Don turned her down was probably all about Don making a mature decision about himself and not about her, it still sort of irked me, because it could also so easily be interpeded as Don being a gentleman. And men being “gentlemen” about sex for no apparent reason always turns me off a bit…

Feministing In Your Inbox

Sign up for our Newsletter to stay in touch with Feministing
and receive regular updates and exclusive content.

164 queries. 0.260 seconds