Unapologetic fat people, coming soon to your living room

Huge, a new show about teens at fat camp, and that stars Hairspray‘s Nikki Blonsky, premieres next week on ABC Family. Judging by this interview with Blonsky, and by the promos, this show is going to do its best to break the mold. Seriously, how often do you hear lines like “everyone wants us to hate our bodies. Well, I refuse to” in the mainstream media? How often do you hear a fat person saying, proudly and without remorse, that they have no intention of losing any weight? Needless to say, I’m pretty excited about Huge. In her interview with The Frisky, Blonsky says,

Huge is groundbreaking because it has never been done before. I don’t think there’s ever been a full cast of plus-size people before. Now there is and kids can tune and say, “Hey, those people look like me and they’re going through the same issues I’m going through.” In this show, we don’t just deal with, “Oh, let’s go jogging and swim 20 laps and lose 30 lbs.” It’s not about that. I mean, eventually as you watch the show, you’re going to forget it’s about a weight-loss camp. You’re just going to get so invested in the characters. We deal with everything from eating disorders to body issues to sexual orientation to everything that every teenager is going through right now.

Imagine that, fat people depicted as normal people dealing with issues other than being fat! Sounds pretty great, though of course I’ll reserve judgment until I’ve actually seen a few episodes (and judging by the look on Blonsky’s face, and her posture, in that poster, it seems wise to avoid jumping to joyous conclusions just yet).

I saw a big billboard advertising Huge last week, and it made me smile. There was Nikki Blonsky, a big fat gorgeous woman in a bathing suit, five stories high on the side of a building, advertising the new show that she’s starring in. But then, I turned the corner and staring back at me was an equally large billboard for H & M, featuring two women in bikinis who were anything but huge. And I was reminded that of all the ads I was going to see that day, Blonsky’s was the exception.

It was a sad, but important reminder: Media that features positive images of women who don’t conform to the rigid definition of beauty provided by Hollywood and the fashion industry are fantastic, and if Huge is everything it claims to be, then we should celebrate it as a sign of progress. But no matter how great it might be, it’s only one show. We need to keep demanding and supporting media that represent all women, of all shapes, colors and sizes. Hopefully, Huge will be an important step in that direction, but even if it is, we’ve still got a long way to go.

and tagged , , . Bookmark the permalink. Both comments and trackbacks are currently closed.

59 Comments

  1. Jessica Lee
    Posted June 24, 2010 at 12:46 am | Permalink

    THANK YOU.
    I’m 5’5″, my weight fluctuates from anywhere between 182-185, and I’m a size 12-14 (sometimes 16 in dresses), and I don’t see my body type very well represented. I also have broad shoulders and smaller hips/ass, not the typical hourglass figure that is seen whenever a TV show or movie wants to present a fat-positive message. I’m sure there’s a market for overweight but not quite plus-sized women.

  2. Honeybee
    Posted June 24, 2010 at 9:36 am | Permalink

    Feminists DO chastize people for being too thin. It’s happened to me on this site and others too.
    It’s gotten to the point where I feel like a bad feminist for being thin, based on of the posts and comments on this site.
    It’s very dismissive of some posters here not to see that this has been happening for a long time here.

  3. Not Guilty
    Posted June 24, 2010 at 11:29 am | Permalink

    I am very skeptical, just because of her posture in that picture. If it was actually going to be what it claims to be, she’d be standing there in a superwoman pose, not a scared kitten. We shall see.

  4. BrainPickerTem
    Posted June 25, 2010 at 1:01 am | Permalink

    I’m surprised by how much fat-shaming there is even among supposedly progressive folks. Since when is it anyone else’s goddamned business if Nikki Blonsky is ‘eating herself to an early grave’?

  5. GrowingViolet
    Posted June 25, 2010 at 8:30 pm | Permalink

    Could we please stop having chains of links to Kate Harding, citing her as a reasonable authority on health or science? The misrepresentation of evidence in which she and her feedback loop of blogs engage on a regular basis is dismaying, as is the cherry-picking and lack of research.

  6. dark_morgaine
    Posted June 26, 2010 at 2:29 am | Permalink

    Monsanto… just the name makes my blood boil! Yes, by all means, we should focus on how high fructose corn syrup increases obesity and unhealthiness in ways that cane sugar never did. Does no one realize that it’s not quantity, but quality of food, that often leads to unhealthy weights? And not just pounds, but fat-to-muscle ratios and the like. Also, as a general rule, the worse a food is for you, the cheaper it is, making low-income families susceptible to the “obesity epidemic”.

  7. GrowingViolet
    Posted June 26, 2010 at 10:00 am | Permalink

    I sincerely doubt that the people who are saying “it’s not okay to be thin” are the same people who are saying “it’s okay to be fat!”
    In my experience, it is absolutely usually the same people. The issue rarely seems to be bodily autonomy or health, but rather the advancement of one particular aesthetic standard disguised as a feminist rejection of patriarchal beauty standards.

  8. GrowingViolet
    Posted June 26, 2010 at 10:04 am | Permalink

    Eating disorders or dieting to be able to fit into a size 0, and other extremes is more what feminism is concerned w/ as I understand it.
    The problem is that feminism often seems happy to engage in concern trolling about perceived excessive thinness, with little or no reference to the reality of eating disorders like anorexia or bulimia. But any discussion of the dangers of obesity, even valid discussion, is actually labelled as “concern trolling,” while there’s utter silence on the reality of disorders like compulsive eating, binge eating, and bulimia that doesn’t produce skinniness (plenty of bulimics aren’t all that thin). The result is a misinformed, distorted, skewed vision of body image, health, and their disorders – no more accurate than what feminism is ostensibly critiquing.

  9. GrowingViolet
    Posted June 26, 2010 at 10:10 am | Permalink

    This comes awfully close to blaming gay men for women’s eating disorders. This is factually baseless – fashion-industry images can be used as “thinspiration” by people already in throes of ED, but they are miles away from the cause. Even cursory consultation of legitimate research on anorexia, bulimia, and related disorders will quickly reveal a consensus among professionals and patients that the fundamental causes involve biological, family, and complex social factors, many of which have little to do with body size per se. Saying that a complex health problem is the fault of [group X] has a long, ugly history, and saying that it’s the fault of gay men has very recent, very intense, ugly history.

Feministing In Your Inbox

Sign up for our Newsletter to stay in touch with Feministing
and receive regular updates and exclusive content.

179 queries. 0.279 seconds