House passes health reform bill

Last night the House of Representatives voted 219 to 212 in favor of the Senate health reform bill. Republicans unanimously opposed the bill and were joined by 34 Democrats. The bill now goes to President Obama’s desk for his signature. The House also voted 220 to 211 in favor of changes to the legislation that came out of negotiations between the House, Senate, and White House. The Senate must approve these changes.

This bill is a major expansion and improvement of the U.S. health care system. This long overdue legislation is the result of almost a century of organizing and political action. It is a considerably weaker bill than we started with about a year ago, though. There is no public option included, surely a win for insurance companies but a loss for the rest of us, and it is not without very serious problems.

The bill would:

  • Expand coverage to 32 million uninsured in the U.S.
  • Create insurance exchanges. The uninsured, self-employed and small businesses could purchase insurance through state-based exchanges. There are subsidies to help purchase insurance through the exchange for those who make between 100 and 400 percent of the federal poverty level.
  • Expand Medicaid to cover those who make up to 133 percent of the federal poverty level. Undocumented immigrants are not eligible for Medicaid.
  • Close the so-called Medicare “donut hole,” a costly gap in prescription drug coverage for seniors.
  • Ban higher premiums and denial of coverage because of preexisting conditions.
  • Ban higher premiums for women.
  • Require coverage of maternity care.
  • Allow children to continue being covered by their parent’s plans through age 26.
  • With some exceptions, require all U.S. citizens to purchase insurance or face a $695 annual fine.
  • Require those with 50 or more employees to insurance or pay a $2000 fine per employee every year if any employee receives federal subsidies for purchasing insurance. The actual employer mandate was removed by the Senate.
  • Ban undocumented immigrants from purchasing insurance with their own money in the new exchanges.
  • Ban the use of federal funds to pay for abortion in the exchange, which experts say will eventually eliminate even private insurance coverage for abortion.

Additional summaries of the bill can be found here and here. Many more documents, including the full bill and summaries, can be found at the Speaker of the House’s website.

I want to be overjoyed by the passage of this bill. It’s so much less than we started this process with, but it is still a major expansion of health insurance coverage. In many ways it’s a big human rights win. But the severe restriction of abortion access and exclusion of undocumented immigrants from coverage are unconscionable. The limits on abortion access go back on a commitment by democrats that this legislation would maintain the (horrible) “status quo” on abortion coverage. This legislation is about giving people in the U.S. access to what should be a basic, fundamental human right: health care. I am so glad that 32 million people who are uninsured will be able to receive care. But abortion is health care. Women who need abortions and undocumented immigrants are just as deserving of basic human rights as anyone else. This legislation fails to recognize these facts, so I have a very hard time celebrating the aspects of the bill that are clearly a victory.

What are your thoughts on the bill passed by the House?

Boston, MA

Jos Truitt is Executive Director of Development at Feministing. She joined the team in July 2009, became an Editor in August 2011, and Executive Director in September 2013. She writes about a range of topics including transgender issues, abortion access, and media representation. Jos first got involved with organizing when she led a walk out against the Iraq war at her high school, the Boston Arts Academy. She was introduced to the reproductive justice movement while at Hampshire College, where she organized the Civil Liberties and Public Policy Program’s annual reproductive justice conference. She has worked on the National Abortion Federation’s hotline, was a Field Organizer at Choice USA, and has volunteered as a Pro-Choice Clinic Escort. Jos has written for publications including The Guardian, Bilerico, RH Reality Check, Metro Weekly, and the Columbia Journalism Review. She has spoken and trained at numerous national conferences and college campuses about trans issues, reproductive justice, blogging, feminism, and grassroots organizing. Jos completed her MFA in Printmaking at the San Francisco Art Institute in Spring 2013. In her "spare time" she likes to bake and work on projects about mermaids.

Jos Truitt is an Executive Director of Feministing in charge of Development.

Read more about Jos

Join the Conversation

lede

Alejandra Pablos’ Detention Reminds Us Immigration is a Reproductive Justice Issue

Two weeks ago, reproductive justice and migrant rights activist, Alejandro Pablos, was detained during a routine check-in with Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) in Tucson. Many have pointed out that Pablos’ detention is the latest in a series of silent raids targeting high-profile immigration activists, including sanctuary movement leader Ravi Ragbir and prison abolition organizer Maru Mora-Villalpando. But Pablos’ detention is also a reminder that immigration is a reproductive justice issue and that we have to fight like hell against an Administration that’s hell-bent on endangering the health and well-being of immigrant women and our families.

Alejandra Pablos works as a field organizer for the National Latina Institute for Reproductive Health (NLIRH), where she focuses on issues ...

Two weeks ago, reproductive justice and migrant rights activist, Alejandro Pablos, was detained during a routine check-in with Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) in Tucson. Many have pointed out that Pablos’ detention is the ...