It is interesting all the speculation around the increase access in technology and new media to people in rural places and how it is or is not emancipating them. Specifically, this article in Slate delves into the commonly discussed question of TV series (Indian equivalent of soaps) and their effects on women in India. According to Slate, these women are being “helped” or rather, brought into the modern times (if you will) by the cable television.
A new study by Robert Jensen of Brown University and Emily Oster of the University of Chicago shows that television is having a distinctly helpful effect on women, at least in rural India, which admittedly doesn’t have America’s half-century of experience with the medium, or 300 channels to surf through.
So I checked out the abstract from the study and it said this:
This paper explores the effect of the introduction of cable television on gender attitudes in rural India. Using a three-year individual-level panel dataset, we find that the introduction of cable television is associated with improvements in women’s status. We find significant increases in reported autonomy, decreases in the reported acceptability of beating and decreases in reported son preference. We also find increases in female school enrollment and decreases in fertility (primarily via increased birth spacing). The effects are large, equivalent in some cases to about five years of education in the cross section, and move gender attitudes of individuals in rural areas much closer to those in urban areas. We argue that the results are not driven by pre-existing differential trends. These results have important policy implications, as India and other countries attempt to decrease bias against women.
I think it can be argued that there is some truth to this. I don’t really prefer Waldfogel’s presumptive nature of the way that things are for women in rural India, as backwards and traditional and the television is helping them come into the light. However, I think some of the trends that are happening, as a result of a change in economy and the women’s movement in India, are probably reflected in television and they mutually reinforce each other.
I am weary of studies that say new technologies emancipate people in “old, narrow and backward” places. There has been similar work done on internet access and rural women in India. Women in rural India have roles and responsibilities, extensive kinship networks, methods of healing, irrigation techniques that “modernization” sometimes wipes out. I am not saying one is better than the other, it is just important to see things for what they are. Series television is very much like soap operas, they are not based in reality, the women reflect idealized and unattainable standards of beauty, and the plot lines are unrealistic and fantastical. So although they women in series may represent a more modern woman, she is also a production of capitalist desire, latching on to upper-middle class notions of success.
It is hard to judge one culture while sitting in another, wondering what exactly emancipation is for rural women in India, having some intense desire for them to be free. While ignoring how many of us are enslaved by the images we watch on television and I would hardly call that freedom.
Ultimately the study found that it was a change in attitude that is most notable, as opposed to a change in actual behavior. I think it is safe to say that TV has the potential to change attitudes everywhere, but it is a matter of the direction that we want it to change in. Mainstream media and its reach has had truly dangerous consequences for the American imagination, so, I maybe a little skeptical of calling the TV in India an “Empowerment box.”
10 Comments
One of my friends has done fieldwork in Belize for the past 10 years.
Where she works, physical abuse of girls and wives is extremely common.
She does say that increased exposure to TV has had some very positive effects on girls. In particular, alot of the girls talk about how Oprah has changed their views about a variety of things, including the acceptability of physical abuse.
Of course other things come along with “westernization” (e.g., increased disordered eating patterns), but she seems to think it has had some positive effects on the girls as well.
Yeah thanks UCLAbodyimage. I think it is a really complex issue. There is no right answer and I don’t even totally know how I feel about it, but I think it is good to see it for what it is, as opposed to, just a good influence.
But you got that, lol.
Even if you considered just the effects of Fox News, “Who Wants to Marry a Millionaire” and “America’s Next Top Model”‘s sexy-dead-women episode on American culture, I’d take them over the social acceptability of domestic abuse.
Hey Samhita -
Just FYI, Here is a copy of their actual paper (alot of times professors post their articles on their home pages).
http://home.uchicago.edu/~eoster/tvwomen.pdf
Ha! Thanks, I was wondering where I could find it.
I don’t have time at the moment to read the actual paper, but a point to remember is that in most studies I’ve seen on suicide (especially in younger people) females are more likely to attempt suicide but males are more likely to succeed. So, while technically China may be the only nation where female suicide rates outweigh men’s, I think it’s important to take that into consideration.
But it still speaks volumes because the woman probably feel that they’re worthless because of their culture overall; whereas a woman in America who attempts suicide is often hoping to fail and receive help/love, the woman there probably feel that wouldn’t be available to them anyway.
I remember watching a very intense news special on sexual slavery in India, which spoke about the effects of television on the culture. I must say first that I saw the show a few years ago in a sociology class and have no real idea about the validity of the show’s arguments, but…
The news show mentioned that television in rural parts of India and Tibet have had a negative impact, largely because of the capitalistic message inherent in most TV programming. People (i.e. men) see the wealth of TV characters and yearn for that lifestyle. They mentioned one guy who then sold his sister to a brothel in Mumbai for $35!
Does anyone know about the actual facts behind this this kind of situation? Again I’m not certain about the validity of this argument, but it definitely shows how in one case TV, the way it is now, can be a bad thing for the uninitiated.
“The news show mentioned that television in rural parts of India and Tibet have had a negative impact, largely because of the capitalistic message inherent in most TV programming. People (i.e. men) see the wealth of TV characters and yearn for that lifestyle. They mentioned one guy who then sold his sister to a brothel in Mumbai for $35!”
Meanwhile, don’t some cultures and subcultures manage to promote acquisition of wealth even without high tech? _Disposable People: New Slavery in the Global Economy_ by Kevin Bales includes a bit on one case of a guy selling his wife to a brothel to pay back the loan he took out to afford the bride price he paid her family…
Tuning in to women’s empowerment?
Actresses from Kyunki Saas Bhi Kabhi Bahu Thi (Because a Mother-in-Law Was Once a Daughter-in-Law)
Two economists have found large and rapidly changing attitudes regarding gender roles among rural Indian communities.
After cable TV was introduced to r…
Soap opera saga
Check out this funny rant about soap operas. Hard to imagine these female characters could actually have a positive influence on women in rural areas, serving as role models of a sort.
…