based on the tone of the article, i have to say the the writer did revel in her act by writing about it in a smug way. it implicates pride in her actions. as i said to someone above, if the guy had sent her a private e-mail agreeing with her, she wouldn’t have felt [...]

point being, it was unnecessary. if he expressed full support of her opinions, i don’t think she would have felt an urge to forward it to his supervisors. it’s possible to confabulate an ethical justification for her actions, but it was ultimately petty.

you can deconstruct it all you like, but it’s her personal truth, and the personal truths for a lot of other women out there. some women do aspire to and enjoy engaging in the heteronormative ideal. calling it “heteronormative” doesn’t intrinsically make it a bad thing. it condescends to the millions of people who choose [...]

i stupidly neglected to take note that he was isolating the black community because i had the statistics of the “multiple fathers” study mentally linked in my head. regarding those statistics however, considering that 13-14% of americans are black americans, it does show a significant disproportion of black recipients on welfare. obviously, there are a [...]

marriage does not necessitate female servitude.

well, considering that the statistic is 28% of ALL women have two or more children with different fathers, it’s definitely a societal phenomenon, and i was responding to that fact. i neglected to take note that he was isolating the black community. re: motherhood and marriage are exclusive occurrences, but there are significant benefits to [...]

i pretty much agree with you.

i wasn’t attempting to be provocative, i just had a different interpretation of the comment. also, i had/have no idea who bryan fischer IS and that he’s a christian fundamentalist who has a history of making irrational statements.

i don’t understand what was so egregiously trollish or wrong about what i said.