Oh you just know this is going to be bad. One of FOX's shows slated for the Fall is called When Women Rule the World and I have to say, the description doesn't give me much hope:
What if it was “a woman’s world�? What if women made ALL the decisions? If men were their obedient subjects?These questions and more will be explored when a group of strong, educated, independent women, tired of living in a man’s world and each with a personal axe to grind, rule over a group of unsuspecting men used to calling the shots on WHEN WOMEN RULE THE WORLD.
The unscripted series will reveal how women and men react in a world where women are in charge and men are subservient, and each gender’s ability to adapt to a new social order will be put to the test.
The participants will be brought to a remote, primitive location where the women will have the opportunity to “rule� as they build a newly formed society – one where there is no glass ceiling and no dressing to impress. For the men, their worlds of power and prestige are turned inside-out and upside-down. And for these women, turnabout is fair play!
In order to win, the men must accede to the women’s every demand, 24/7. Here, women command and men obey. Over the series’ duration, the men will be eliminated by the women until one last man is standing.
How will the men react? How will the women treat the men? Can women effectively rule society? Will the men learn what life is like for some women in today’s world? Will this new society be a Utopia or a hell on earth? And in the end, who will be man enough to succeed in the new social order? (Emphasis added)
Oh dear.
0 TrackBacks
Listed below are links to blogs that reference this entry: New FOX show: When Women Rule the World.
TrackBack URL for this entry: http://www.feministing.com/cgi-bin/movabletype/mt-tb.fcgi/5603





*headdesk*
*headdesk*
*headdesk*
No words....just...
*headdesk*
But it's on FOX. I'm sure it will a thoughtful exploration of gender role-reversal?
But it's on FOX. I'm sure it will a thoughtful exploration of gender role-reversal.
Holy straw man. Is Rupert Murdoch himself going to light the match to burn this effigy of "feminism"?
Blarf.
It's Fox. "Oh, dear" isn't just an expression of concern... it's a foregone conclusion.
Also, "reality" shows have been getting progressively dumber since their inception.
Combine the two, and the only reason the show might survive past its first week is because it panders to "lowest common denominator" viewers.
I'm torn between writing postcards expressing disgust and using the "just don't watch it, and convince others to also not watch it" method.
Yeah, looks like shite to me. I'll put it on my schedule right next to all those other reality shows, in fact all FOX shows, I never watch either.
This deserves bolding, too:
"who will be man enough to succeed in the new social order?"
Yeah . . . the problem is that the goal of feminism isn't for men to be subservient to women, but for people of both sexes and all genders to be considered equal to one another.
Too bad the show is on Fox. I'll be surprised if they don't have the women leaving their husbands, killing their children and becoming lesbians!
And I'm sure that team Murdoch will pick out a series of well-adjusted, intelligent women who have merely been stifled by the sexism that all women in our society, and that, given the opportunity to act independently, will act in harmony, rationally discussing things...
yes?
"Too bad the show is on Fox. I'll be surprised if they don't have the women leaving their husbands, killing their children and becoming lesbians!"
Nope, instead they'll find the dumbest, most shallow, catty group of women possible and have them fight constantly. The men will probably do the same thing. It's reality tv on FOX. Most reality shows are designed for people who didn't get enough of middle school behavior the first (two or three, I'm assuming) times they were actually there.
I also have a feeling "strong, independent" means loud, impatient and nasty in this context. Yay!
Too bad, because done right this could be an interesting exploration of gender roles, but the chances of that happening are zero to none.
i think this would be a better show:
"What if it was “a duckbilled platypus's world�? What if duckbilled platypi made ALL the decisions? If people were their obedient subjects?"
redscorpse: Seriously, LOL. I don't even have TV, but I'd watch that show on TVLinks.
How will the men react? How will the women treat the men? Can women effectively rule society? Will the men learn what life is like for some women in today’s world? Will this new society be a Utopia or a hell on earth?
Let's see if I understand this:
They're going to take a probably hypermasculine group of men who are used to being in control and dominating people and put them in a situation where they have to obey the orders of a group of women who have personal axes to grind and are probably going to make ridiculous, demeaning, or insulting demands of the group of men?
Oh, yes. Nothing spells Utopia more than two groups of unreasonable people with an artificially created power differential that is intentionally designed to piss off one of the groups.
Oh, wait, no... that spells Conflict.
roymac: Oh, wait, no... that spells Ratings.
Goddamn reality TV. What I'm worried about is the sheer number of people who are going to take this shit seriously. "OMG! Wimmenz totally CANNOT rule the world! Look at how MEAN they are to those men, who never did anything to them!"
I can see the promo now:
"Thinking about voting for Hillary Clinton? Think again. Find out what happens when women run the show. We'll give you a hint -- it's not pretty!"
I'm really suspicious about just how "unscripted" this is going to be. Since it doesn't appear that the women are competing for anything, I strongly suspect that they'll be given directions that stop just short of scripted lines. I can't imagine that the show's producers are just going to let both groups go at it with out any interference. At this point I'm just hoping that it won't be actively offensive.
Yeah, imagine if the first thing the women want to do is to ditch the rules and cooperate? I am sure that would fly.
Wow, blindcavefish, I hadn't even thought of that. But now that you bring it up, I wonder how coincidental this timing is.
Oh, yeah, I totally thought of the timing vis a vis Hillary Clinton.
Ew, blindcavefish. You're so right.
JustAnOutsider: Keep on hoping. Maybe pigs can fly and Satan is throwing snowballs in Hell.
I agree with all the above comments. Also, does anyone else find it interesting that the wording indicates that they are blatantly acknowledging the fact that men are currently in control over women? Isn't this the same group of people who would, under normal circumstances, fervently deny any remaining vesiges of patriarchy? Then again, maybe not. There was a YouTube clip of a Fox interview where the interviewer explicitly stated something to the effect of, "They're breaking down our white, male, Christian power structure." That's almost verbatim (I can go look up the link if anyone is interested).
Its just sounds like a fem-dom, male-sub porn show.
There was a YouTube clip of a Fox interview where the interviewer explicitly stated something to the effect of, "They're breaking down our white, male, Christian power structure." That's almost verbatim (I can go look up the link if anyone is interested).
The story was covered here not too long ago. The commentator was good ol' BillO. He was talking about immigrants from south of the border.
This is bound to be sexist in so very many ways - where both sexes are concerned.
Nice one, Fux network. I bet they'll make the women dress in Dominatrix gear, while they're at it.
That takes care of that, then. ^_^ Thanks, EvilPotato.
I thought Desperate Housewives was on ABC.
Because everyone knows that the only alternative to a male-dominated world is a female-dominated world. I mean, can you imagine what would happen if people of both sexes could achieve power and respect based on their own individual characteristics? It would be chaos -- chaos!
One thing this show is definitely going to "forget" to show is that the women who are supposedly in charge (as well as the men) are still going to be subordinate to the people making the show. They're the real rulers, regardless of the dynamics between the "contestants."
I don't know for sure that a "hypermasculine" man put into a subordinate position would be especially inclined to rebel - the stereotypical domain of hypermasculinity is the military, in which people are expected to submit to their superior officers and dominate their subordinates. "Basic training" could be conceptualized as indoctrination into a particular hypermasculine setting, and the indoctrination consists of putting new recruits into a position in which they must submit constantly to a designated superior.
This show's format even turns submission into a competition. It's still the same old "males competing against other males themselves for female attention" setup, and the implied rules are that he with the biggest capacity for enduring "hardship" wins.
It's a mildly amusing concept for a game show, but it's still practically guaranteed to be stupid and play into the hands of gender stereotypes.
I'm going to echo what Cara and probably a few others have said: why, for us to be together as a society, does one sex/gender have to be subservient to the other? Have we just gotten so used to gender/race/class issues that the idea of equality is that far gone? It seems to me the only people who want to "rule" over others are men (rich and white most likely) and they just can't function in society with out that discrepancy amongst everyone.
I have a better idea for a reality TV show. How about a show where intellectuals wake up in a world with a racist and sexist power structure where all the important decisions are made by an elite group with an interest only in consolidating and expanding their own power at any cost, and this same elite group in power is given the divine right by hordes of mindless human herd animals.
You could just call this show the evening news.
Many science fiction novels have used similar premises; perhaps the oldest is "A Connecticut Yankee in King Arthur's Court" by Mark Twain. One wonders what future generations will think of our world...
It's kind of interesting that the description is saying that, as of right now, men rule women. You wouldn't think that Fox would ever admit to something like that. They would probably deny that sexism still exists against women.
Also, it's interesting how these people think that if women aren't going to be subservient to men, then men must be subservient to women.
And you just KNOW that these women are going to act like bitches because, honestly, that's the only way the show will be interesting. It wouldn't really reflect how the world would be if.. uh.. "WOMEN RULED THE WORLD!"
And then you'll probably have stupid conservative assholes watching the show and saying things like "See! This is why women can't be in control. They make us do crazy things, like RESPECT them!"
This whole thing is a ridiculous set-up to discredit feminism, and it's obvious. Sigh.
It's funny. I have friends (very nice couple) who are down in LA, showbiz types. The husband does script-writing. For reality TV shows. Just sayin' is all.
Llencelyn - I also thought it was interesting that the show's description admitted that men dominate women in our society. I felt the tone was pretty demeaning, like the producers are off somewhere rubbing their hands together and salivating at the thought of how the community will fall apart once women are in control. I mean, one menstrual cycle and there goes all the nuclear bombs!
I'm glad I don't have cable.
By reversing the gender roles to make women dominant and men subserviant is simply supporting the notion that women are actually subserviant. This is pretty classic of the media's patriarchal spin. What a concept, women ruling... since this is a television show it must be pretty fantastic and false.
It's kind of interesting that the description is saying that, as of right now, men rule women. You wouldn't think that Fox would ever admit to something like that. They would probably deny that sexism still exists against women.
It's just a testament to the arrogance of the network's top executives. Fox honestly believes they have nothing to lose by admitting that white, Christian men rule the world, which naturally includes women. They're not even evolved to the point where they can make the (however specious) argument made by conservatives who claim to be more socially-conscious: "What are you complaining about, bitches? You're liberated already! Stop whining." They're so out of touch that they honestly think that no one would deny that that's how things are; after all, it's obvious to them.
This show is all kinds of wrong and all kinds of irresponsible.
The executive producer, Jean Michel-Michenaud, is the same guy behind Joe Millionaire, Temptation Island and Trading Spouses: Meet Your New Mommy (the other two EP are basically his staff from Trading Spouses and a few other shows).
I wonder if he actually thinks this is a feminist idea or if he's actually a raging mysoginist considering his other shows?
...if this was any other minority in the world, you know this idea wouldn't have passed by the head honchos, even if it was on Fox. But women? whatever, they're just bitching because they're on the rag.
Nice to know I'm subject to the last acceptable prejudice (at least, considered so by those Fox assholes.)
Remember when Fox was only watched for The Simpsons?
NewsCat: Considering Joe Millionaire alone is enough to convince me that it's raging misogyny that's at the heart of this show.
Also, as I said higher up, I really think that Fox is creating and promoting the show this way because of blind misogyny (much like Joe Millionaire). They don't even know or care how offensive it is to say outright, "Men rule the world. What if we gave it to women for a while? *yukyukyuk*" "Yeah, that's a great idea, Jim! They'd run around yelling and PMSing and fighting with each other while the men rolled their eyes behind their backs!" "You're right, Bob! That's comedy gold! And I bet the women will be really grateful that we let them control us for a while, too. My wife nags me about it all the time."
LOL, damn HTML tags. Sorry for all the shouting.
Just wanted to point out that the Fox news division and the Fox entertainment division operate pretty much independently. It's unlikely that this show is right-wing propaganda in disquise. Instead it's more likely to be good 'ol frat-boy style misogyny. Or in other words, it's going to be tasteless, but there's probably no overt political agenda.
This is a huge flaming piece of shite and I dont think viewers will take it. TV shows have like a 90% failure rate. I dont think we have to worry too much about this being on the air for too long. We can definitely get it off faster by writing in and complaining like crazy.
Even though there is so much shit out there, I trust that it will be so bad, it will be cancelled. The advertisers will not like funding a controversial show. It will just make them look worse.
Now, let's do some wordage switcheroo, yeah?
Huh. Somehow I can't see that one being thrown in the primetime lineup anytime soon...