Common Application now more accessible for undocumented students—just kidding

dreamactivitistsEd. note: This post is by Feministing’s social media intern, Dahlia Grossman-Heinze. You can follow her on Instagram @grossmad and on tumblr.

At this year’s National Conference on Race and Ethnicity in American Higher Education, Daniel Vargas, The Common Application’s Communications Director made an amazing announcement. Starting with this year’s Common Application, a universal college application accepted at more than 400 American colleges and universities, “Undocumented American” would be added as an option to select in the demographics portion of the application, and “Undocumented Status” would be added to The Common Application Inc.’s non-discrimination clause, which legally binds all the member institutions who accept the application.

The only problem? Vargas does not work for The Common Application—he’s an undocumented activist named David Ramirez who staged the performance to call attention to barriers undocumented students face in education. When Colorlines attempted to verify the story with Common Application Director of Outreach Scott Anderson, he stated that “The Common Application has not made any announcement regarding undocumented students.” Anderson also confirmed that “there is no one named Daniel Vargas on our staff or Board of Directors.”

In Ramirez’s fake press release he included pretty serious quotes attributed to the Executive Director of The Common Application, Rob Killion, which read, “The Common Application, Inc. annually revises our Common App, but never have our changes had such an impact in creating opportunity for an entire community,” and  “Private colleges inaccurately have been labeling undocumented students as international students which guarantees a separate and unequal admissions process. Until now, this discrimination has been permitted and facilitated by The Common Application, Inc.” 

While The Common Application has denied any connection to Ramirez, along with the accuracy of his claims, now it’s up to them to deal with the fallout—Ramirez’s hoax statement was met with applause and support. Like the fake PINK loves CONSENT campaign last year, now the pressure is on The Common Application—will they disavow the points made by Ramirez and make themselves seem like they are okay with perpetuating discrimination and inequity of access, or will they embrace the opportunity and move toward making The Common Application and its member institutions more accessible for undocumented students? The ball’s in their court.

and tagged , , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink. Both comments and trackbacks are currently closed.

3 Comments

  1. Posted June 6, 2013 at 4:51 pm | Permalink

    It’s not discrimination to expect people to obey the laws and be here legally if they expect to enroll as U.S. citizens.

  2. Posted June 6, 2013 at 10:58 pm | Permalink

    I refuse to condone fraud and gross misrepresentation even when used in support of a noble cause.

  3. Posted June 7, 2013 at 3:12 pm | Permalink

    Let me rephrase this a little and see if you’re still so enamored of the tactic…

    “While ACORN has denied any connection to O’Keefe, along with the accuracy of his claims, now it’s up to them to deal with the fallout”

    There, not so much fun anymore, is it….ratf*cking is ratf*cking, no matter which side does it.

    The Yes Men get away with it because their stunts are so clearly over-the-top satire; screwing up something like The Common Application, like screwing with ACORN can really mess up the lives of a whole lot of innocent people. Not cool.

186 queries. 0.460 seconds