Breaking: Appeals court allows over the counter access to some but not all emergency contraception

The Second Circuit Court of Appeals today granted the Obama administration a stay on access to one-pill forms of emergency contraception. But the court also ruled that two-pill variants should be available over the counter immediately and without harsh age restrictions. So Judge Korman’s important ruling that EC should be available over the counter should at least partially go into effect. This is another blow to the Obama administration’s attack on young people’s reproductive rights, and another victory for access to EC.

I happen to believe that when a presidential administration consistently acts to block access to reproductive health care, that means they’re demonstrably anti-feminist. I don’t care how well you talk the talk or how many feminist parties you show up to, actions are most important. The Obama administration has acted to block reproductive health care access in such an obviously political manner, a federal judge wrote that,  “The FDA bowed to political pressure emanating from the White House and departed from agency policy,” and that, “Even with eyes shut to the motivation for [HHS Secretary Kathleen Sebelius'] decision, the reasons she provided are so unpersuasive as to call into question her good faith.” Luckily, we’re winning access to EC despite the Obama administration’s best efforts.

Previously: Age restrictions on emergency contraception access are unacceptable. 

and tagged , , , . Bookmark the permalink. Both comments and trackbacks are currently closed.

2 Comments

  1. Posted June 5, 2013 at 4:33 pm | Permalink

    Part of what I love about Feministing is the thoughtful, multi-faceted analysis of its writers. While I’m definitely happy with the decision of the Court of Appeals, I’m disappointed that we’re stopping the analysis at “well, the Obama admin is restricting access to reproductive services. ANTIFEMINISTS.” As a Feminist, I receive a lot of criticism that the movement doesn’t recognize its allies from its enemies. It’s analysis like this that I think make that statement legitimate. The Obama Admin, and Sebelius in particular, fought for women’s reproductive rights in the Affordable Care Act. Moreover, Obama has done his share for a lot of feminist causes- appointing women judges, refusing to defend DOMA, signing Lily Ledbetter. Is the administration perfect? Nope. Is is anywhere near as awesome as Hillarys would have been? Obvi not. Should we critique it? Absolutely. But let’s be fair and thorough and avoid blanket statements.

  2. Posted June 5, 2013 at 6:06 pm | Permalink

    It’s more important that access to EC be protected than to signal that access to EC is important.

    By making a blocking attempt that fails appeals, the Obama administration is causing a court precedent to be set, which will be harder for future executives or legislators to overcome.

    I’m not sure what the actual motivations are, but the actual effect is to make EC harder to prohibit.

Feministing In Your Inbox

Sign up for our Newsletter to stay in touch with Feministing
and receive regular updates and exclusive content.

167 queries. 1.298 seconds