Israel punishes Palestinians for wanting a state

On Thursday, the United Nations general assembly voted to make Palestine a state. Of the 193-member assembly, 138 voted in favor, 41 abstained and nine–Israel, the US, Canada, the Czech Republic, the Marshall Islands, Micronesia, Nauru, Palau and Panama– voted against it. With this historic vote, Palestine went from being a ”non-member observer entity” to a “non-member observer state”. The new state cannot vote, and has the same status as the Vatican, but it can, for example, join international bodies like the International Criminal Court (ICC).

“We didn’t come here seeking to delegitimize a state established years ago, and that is Israel; rather we came to affirm the legitimacy of the state that must now achieve its independence, and that is Palestine,” Mahmoud Abbas, president of the Fatah-led Palestinian Authority, told the general assembly.

Israel and the United States opposed Palestinian statehood, claiming it undermined the peace process. U.S. Ambassador Susan Rice delivered the following self-fulfilling prophecy:

 Today’s unfortunate and counterproductive resolution places further obstacles to peace…. No resolution can create a state where none exists….Palestinians will wake up tomorrow and find that little has changed saved the prospect of direct talks have receded.

Tell that to the Palestinians celebrating at the beginning of this video, Suze.

Despite the U.S. and Israeli objections, many people, including Israelis (see below) argue that the only hope for peace in the region, for a two state solution, and for Israeli security is the existence of a Palestinian state.

Israel responded with the peace-loving gesture punitive move of announcing new settlements and seizing funds from the Palestinian Authority. A day after the historic vote, Israel authorized 3,000 new homes in Jewish-only settlements in East Jerusalem and the West Bank. At a cabinet meeting on Sunday, Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu said, ”Today we are building, and we will continue to build in Jerusalem and in all areas that are on the state of Israel’s map of strategic interests.” Israel is also moving forward with a settlement that will split the West Bank in half, cutting off the northern West Bank from the south and from East Jerusalem, and making a physical Palestinian state impossible.  Hagit Ofran of the Israeli group Peace Now argued the settlement is “at the heart of the potential Palestinian state. If Israel is to build in E1, there is no possible agreement on a two-state solution, because a Palestinian state will be cut between the south and the north of the state, and it won’t be a viable state.”

U.N. Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon said continued Israeli settlement activity would strike a “fatal blow” to peace efforts.

And we’re supposed to believe that Palestinians’ aspirations for statehood is the roadblock to peace?

and tagged , , , . Bookmark the permalink. Both comments and trackbacks are currently closed.

One Comment

  1. Posted December 3, 2012 at 11:10 pm | Permalink

    I just want to say that while I’m not pro-settlement-building or anything, this is such a huge and complicated issue with a huge and complicated history. I am definitely no expert, but I think it’s kind of reductionist to imply that settlement-building is the only roadblock to peace. There’s not a lot of history in the region that is mutually agreed upon, but from what I can tell, there have been MANY roadblocks to peace on both sides.

Feministing In Your Inbox

Sign up for our Newsletter to stay in touch with Feministing
and receive regular updates and exclusive content.

163 queries. 0.549 seconds