What We Missed

Whaaat? The writer who created the character Josh Lyman is in real life arrogant and condescending to women? No way.

What’s the matter with Kansas? Well, its non-stop crusade against abortion providers, for one thing.

Alyssa Rosenberg on “Brave” and why gender performance and sexual orientation are not the same thing.

. Bookmark the permalink. Both comments and trackbacks are currently closed.

2 Comments

  1. Posted June 25, 2012 at 7:44 pm | Permalink

    On the Brave column: I am so glad that a movie has finally come out that tells little girls to be themselves however they see fit. This line in particular struck a chord with me: “And if a girl is defying the gendered norms laid out for her, that should be a sign that we question the adequacy of the norms in capturing the diversity of girls’ experiences, rather than the girl herself.”
    Also – who cares what the sexual orientation of a cartoon character is? Shame on Entertainment Weekly for making it an issue. (Seriously – if it’s anyone’s weird issues they should be examining it’s Ariel from The Little Mermaid. Giving up your voice to land the guy? Seems like something Michigan legislators would fully support…)

  2. Posted June 26, 2012 at 1:32 pm | Permalink

    While Josh was certainly arrogant, I reject your insinuation that he was condescending to women. I agree that Aaron Sorkin is, but please do not imply that Josh was in some way an extension of Sorkin. Josh was true and kind and honest and yes, an asshole. But he was not condescending toward women.

Feministing In Your Inbox

Sign up for our Newsletter to stay in touch with Feministing
and receive regular updates and exclusive content.

168 queries. 0.279 seconds