“Objectivity” in journalism has been redefined to mean that every idea spouted by someone with a publicist deserves equal weight, regardless of whether it’s a bold faced lie. At least that’s the only conclusion I can come to when I see CNN writing about the nice, friendly, environmentalist organization known as the KKK.
“We’re not racists,” [April] Chambers, [secretary of the North Georgia chapter of the Ku Klux Klan] told CNN Monday. “We just want to be with white people.”
The North Georgia KKK was trying to adopt a highway. Which isn’t even a veiled attempt to win positive publicity – it’s completely unsubtle and obvious. But apparently that’s enough for CNN to publish an article that serves as free PR for the KKK. (I’m not linking to the article. I don’t want to help CNN’s web stats for advertising for the Klan.) Shockingly, a Georgia official has said the hate group will not get to adopt a highway.
Yeah, CNN throws in a couple inches of alternative perspective, you know, for “balance”:
“These groups are interested in the press they know they are going to get off this – it doesn’t have anything to do with improving the world,” said Mark Potok, editor in chief of the Intelligence Report, which tracks hate groups and extremists for the Southern Poverty Law Center.
Which is why you don’t fucking publish the article. Except I guess “objectivity” now means exercising zero editorial judgement to notice when you’re being played by bigots.
The KKK is a hate group. Do I really need to say that? Does it really just take members of the Klan saying “We’re not racist!” for us to accept that they’re all hugs and puppies now? Even though they all manage to make creepy statements about looking out for white interests and sticking with white people immediately after? Have we forgotten there’s a racist hierarchy in this country, and that the Klan are some of the worst, most violent defenders of that system? Really?