Breaking: House Committee on Foreign Relations votes to reinstate Global Gag Rule

Perhaps you remember the infamous Global Gag rule, also known as the Mexico City Policy, wherein any non-government organization (NGO) doing international work and receiving federal funding could not give access or information about abortion as a form of family planning. As a policy, it is draconian, and in many ways makes us the laughing stock of the international human rights community. Presidents have gone back and forth over it along party lines, starting with Reagan, struck down by Clinton, reinstated by G-dubs and then overturned by executive order by Obama in 2009. This was one of the best moves Obama made in his first few weeks in office to support access to abortion.

Today, according to twitter by way of the Foreign Relations Committee live feed, the House Foreign Relations Committee failed to strike down the first draft of the Foreign Affairs Authorization Act, which includes reinstating the Global Gag law (among a slue of other things).

via Wapo:

The panel backed a provision banning U.S. taxpayer money, usually Agency for International Development funds, from going to international family planning groups that either offer abortions or provide abortion information, counseling or referrals. Exceptions are for rape, incest or if the life of the mother is in danger.

The committee turned back an effort by the top Democrat, Rep. Howard Berman of California, to strike the abortion provision. The vote was 25-17.

Berman complained that the policy “prevents poor women and families around the world from gaining access to essential information and health care services.” He added that the provision bars all assistance, including funds for HIV and AIDS, child survival, education and water and sanitation.

Berman is right, but this is just another zany right wing attempt at ruining women’s lives. Luckily, it will most likely not make it through the Senate.

and tagged , , , . Bookmark the permalink. Both comments and trackbacks are currently closed.

2 Comments

  1. Posted July 21, 2011 at 1:30 pm | Permalink

    “Berman is right, but this is just another zany right wing attempt at ruining women’s lives. Luckily, it will most likely not make it through the Senate.”
    Keep in mind there are MANY women out there who support these kinds of bills.

    They’re not even THINKING about the women’s lives at all.
    It’s more apathetic than malicious.

  2. Posted July 21, 2011 at 5:41 pm | Permalink

    1) I doubt this provision will remain in any consensus bill, but if it does make it through I’m unsure what Obama could do about it.

    2) The gag rule, and especially the capriciousness with which it is put in and then repealed by various administrations, does wonders for the various third-world clinics who have to make a choice between changing their services and running out of money every 4-8 years, as I’m sure everyone can imagine. And what’s worse, the Rule isn’t even a restriction on just American money. You can be 90% Pakistani funded for goodness sake, and you’ll still lose the 10% American if you perform an abortion. That’s a hell of a choice.

    3) Wrong form of “slew” at the end of the second paragraph.

168 queries. 0.451 seconds