Unretouched make up ad a reminder the problem’s much bigger

I’m pretty sure Make Up For Ever had folks like the Feministing community in mind when they put together this ad:

Thin blond white model takes a picture of her made up face. Copy reads You're looking at the first unretouched make up ad

The ad claims to be the first for make up that isn’t retouched. The feminist critique of retouched images of models has gone mainstream, so I’m not surprised to see a make up company engage with it directly. But I see this more as an attempt to co-opt the critique in order to sell a product than actual progress. Don’t get me wrong, I love make up – my feminism has equal space for stilettos and work boots. But this ad still represents a very specific beauty standard – the model is still incredibly thin, white, blond, the photo’s still lit and shot professionally to make her look as smooth, thin, and pale as possible, and the make up is still done by a professional. In fact, pointing out the ad wasn’t retouched serves to make this unattainable idea of beauty seem more real. Retouching is part of the problem of what the beauty industry’s selling us, but it really just scratches the surface.

So kudos to feminism for pushing this issue to the point where a major make up company starts engaging with our ideas in its ads. But sorry Make Up For Ever, you’re not gonna make me think you’ve gotten unproblematic that easily.

Via Jezebel

and tagged , . Bookmark the permalink. Both comments and trackbacks are currently closed.


  1. Posted March 15, 2011 at 4:52 pm | Permalink

    She does have those little bumps on her arm. Her camera is off, though.

  2. Posted March 15, 2011 at 5:58 pm | Permalink

    I don’t have a problem with professional photography, flattering lighting, stylists, etc. There will always be pretty people in the world. I’d love to see more diversity, but at least this woman EXISTS.

  3. Posted March 15, 2011 at 5:58 pm | Permalink

    I struggle with this: that beauty isn’t a total social construct, in that we are all engineered to see certain people as attractive–we can all, for instance, agree on what facial structure is attractive (wide cheek bones, large eyes, small nose, small chin), and do so across cultures. We have the impulse to evaluate each other, so the question isn’t about undoing that impulse necessarily; indeed, this ad privileges a different kind of purity: touch up free is almost a religious statement that my beauty (however stereotypical) comes without aids, and I’m still the hottest thing in the room without trying SO LONG AS you use this make-up.

    • Posted March 16, 2011 at 2:56 am | Permalink

      “we can all, for instance, agree on what facial structure is attractive (wide cheek bones, large eyes, small nose, small chin), and do so across cultures.”

      You’re not completely right about that.

      But even so, any cross-cultural study done in the last 30-40 years is necessarily dealing with cultures who are exposed to much of the same media. Poor people in many countries of Africa idolize the same American celebrities that we do, for instance. So cross-cultural comparison may not be all that valuable in this day and age for determining what is truly “innate.”

  4. Posted March 16, 2011 at 6:46 am | Permalink

    I have a big problem with the notion that the stereotypically beautiful creature–blonde, thin, and probably a teenager pretending to be a women–STILL is supposed to wear make up to be attractive. I know the make up company has to sell the product. In this case I am not blaming them for doing that they have to do. The fact that this message still is considered believable makes me sick.

  5. Posted March 16, 2011 at 10:47 am | Permalink

    I don’t think they are trying to show they are more feminist or progressive than other make up companies; I think they are just saying that their product is so good it looks touched up when it’s not.

    Also, can anyone read what the little comment on the side says?

  6. Posted March 16, 2011 at 3:37 pm | Permalink

    I don’t object. I got what I need from the ad. I want to know that it’s not re-touched. I expect an ad to be well-lit and staged to look great. After all, they are trying to sell a product.

    eleanore – The Spinsterlicious Life

  7. Posted March 17, 2011 at 3:06 pm | Permalink

    Actually, if you look at the whole campaign, it is rather diverse:


    While it would be nice to see a variety of body types, it doesn’t seem right to criticize a company for a campaign when they are actually taking steps in the right direction.

Feministing In Your Inbox

Sign up for our Newsletter to stay in touch with Feministing
and receive regular updates and exclusive content.

191 queries. 0.539 seconds