Pentagon recommends DADT repeal

Yesterday, on the 17 year anniversary of Don’t Ask Don’t Tell being signed into law, the Pentagon released its study on this controversial and discriminatory policy. The results are pretty clear: over 2/3 of service members believe ending DADT would have a positive, mixed, or no effect.

Further, service members know they are already serving with gay and lesbian soldiers, and the majority don’t have a problem with this. The authors of the study and the joint chiefs are now supportive of repealing DADT. And the study’s authors also recommend removing language from the Uniform Code of Military Justice that bans “consensual sodomy.” The full report can be found here.

The release of this study is the latest step in President Obama’s methodical and formal approach to repealing DADT, which has frustrated a lot of LGBT activists working on this issue. In a statement the president called on Congress to continue this process:

With our nation at war and so many Americans serving on the front lines, our troops and their families deserve the certainty that can only come when an act of Congress ends this discriminatory policy once and for all. The House of Representatives has already passed the necessary legislation. Today I call on the Senate to act as soon as possible so I can sign this repeal into law this year and ensure that Americans who are willing to risk their lives for their country are treated fairly and equally.

Now work to repeal DADT moves to the Senate, and there is a push to have this happen in the lame duck session. Some Republican opposition is still expected, despite the support of the Pentagon.

What are your reactions to the release of this study and the way the process of repealing DADT is proceeding?

and tagged . Bookmark the permalink. Both comments and trackbacks are currently closed.

One Comment

  1. Posted December 1, 2010 at 12:38 pm | Permalink

    Sometimes slow and steady wins the race, as the saying goes. I’m always conflicted when making statements about the progression of reform measures, since it often seems like a case of comparing apples with oranges. I want strong, sweeping, decisive action but I also recognize that such conduct often produces push-back and a sense of resentment.

    The good news in all of this is that it does underscore that, with time, we have become far less homophobic as a nation and a society. Many of the arguments made against establishing Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell back in the early 90′s are no longer present. I recall that one line of logic went that since the military was a moral institution, the immorality of homosexuality would compromise its moral purpose. I happen to think any institution designed to kill people in times of war is not exactly a grand example of morality, but that’s just my opinion.

Feministing In Your Inbox

Sign up for our Newsletter to stay in touch with Feministing
and receive regular updates and exclusive content.

162 queries. 0.470 seconds