Australian rugby player Brett Stewart has been charged with sexual assault and indecent assault of a 17-year-old girl, leading to his suspension from the league. The case is currently in court, and this week the manager of Stewart’s club took to the stand to defend him. The Sydney Morning Herald reports:
Ms Lees, who has worked at the club for 12 years, said she had daily contact with the players.
When it came to answering fans’ correspondence, Stewart took more time than any other player to respond to every fan, she said.
“He’s the most consistent out of all of our players; he makes the effort every week.”
Not all players responded personally to fan mail, she added.
Lees called the allegations against Stewart “absolutely, totally unbelievable.”
Leaving aside the notorious culture of entitlement and exceptionalism found in the NRL, and the fact that this is far from the first time an NRL player has been accused of sexual violence, can someone explain to me how answering fan mail and sexual assault are in any way related? Are we really supposed to believe that because this young man responds to letters from fans and gives his time to charities, he is somehow incapable of committing sexual assault? Ms Lees might be right when she says that Stewart “has never let her down,” but if Stewart is guilty, I hate to think that answering fan mail, of all things, could be his get-out-of-jail-free card.