How not to talk about an assault accusation

We don’t always agree with Slate’s William Saletan here at Feministing, but I have to say that I was really disappointed to hear the way he recently discussed an alleged sexual assault. Last week, Saletan was a guest on Slate’s Political Gabfest, the magazine’s excellent weekly politics podcast. At the end of each episode, the panelists offer up a piece of cocktail chatter, some light relief to discuss with friends and fellow party-goers once you’ve put away the big political guns. Here’s what Saletan said when asked for his chatter of choice at the end of the “Groping Duck” edition of the Gabfest:

I have to talk about of course Donald Duck. Donald Duck has been sued, ladies and gentlemen. The person who plays Donald Duck at Disneyworld has had complaint filed, a lawsuit for $50, 000 including PTSD by a woman who claims she was fondled by Donald. This was reported by Gawker with an allusion – the complaint actually cites a previous complaint against Tigger, who was racked up on charges, was arrested, put through trial, twenty-four additional complaints against Tigger. The problem is, Tigger got acquitted, and it turned out to be a total scam. Tigger was totally innocent, and this was, by the way, one of five people playing Tigger, except Disney didn’t want people to know there are five Tiggers because the kids will find out there’s a human inside. So Tigger was innocent, I strongly suspect Donald is innocent. Some people who’ve worked at Disneyworld say to be Donald you’ve gotta be really short, you’ve gotta be a woman, basically. So it’s highly unlikely that the woman playing Donald was groping this woman at Disneyworld, and I hope Donald is exonerated.

Firstly, Saletan’s smart enough to know that the acquittal of one person in a fluffy suit does not guarantee the innocence of another. If that kind of reasoning held any water, we’d never prosecute anyone for armed robbery, or murder or any crime, since people have been falsely accused and acquitted in the past. Is it possible that this is a scam, and that some woman is trying to cheat Disney out of a chunk of change? Sure, it’s possible, but that’s not really the point. Accusations of sexual assault should be taken seriously, and should be fully investigated, not ignored just because someone who worked in the same theme park was once falsely accused of the same crime.

Secondly, Saletan doesn’t seem to consider the possibility that being a woman doesn’t disqualify the person playing Donald Duck from being guilty of the crime in question. Women are capable of sexual assault, too.

Finally, when you listen to the audio, it’s hard not to get the feeling that Saletan finds this story highly amusing. But if the accusations are true, this woman was groped by someone who was on the job and who was wearing what is, despite the fact that it’s furry and cartoon-themed, their work uniform. If it were an MTA employee, or a policeman, or a uniformed security guard being accused of the same crime, would it be quite so amusing? Sexual assault is sexual assault, no matter who does it, no matter what they’re wearing when they do it, and no matter who has been acquitted of it in the past. It’s a serious problem and a accusation, and it should be treated as such.

and tagged , . Bookmark the permalink. Both comments and trackbacks are currently closed.

4 Comments

  1. Posted August 16, 2010 at 12:00 pm | Permalink

    Chloe I completely agree with all your points and am disturbed by how amusing he thinks this whole situation is. I mean, yes it could be a scam, but if not you’re laughing at a woman who has been assaulted, that’s just cruel. And to just toss out the idea that women can assault other women? Okay Saletan. I guess in his world there also aren’t any short men…?

  2. Posted August 16, 2010 at 12:30 pm | Permalink

    Wow – how completely dismissive. It’s so sad that sexually assult has somehow become funny because furry animals are involved. Perhaps it’s Saletan who was surprised to find out that there’s an actual human inside…

    I find this really troubling as well: “So it’s highly unlikely that the woman playing Donald was groping this woman at Disneyworld, and I hope Donald is exonerated.”

    As if a woman couldn’t possibly sexually assault another woman…

  3. Posted August 16, 2010 at 2:28 pm | Permalink

    This kind of blatant suspension of logic is just fucking incredible. And with bonus heteronormativity! How refreshing.
    Saletan should be prepared to receive recognition via the Bitch Douchebag Decree and a Friday Feminist Fuck You, for sure.

  4. Posted August 26, 2010 at 12:46 am | Permalink

    Fine, take the accusation seriously. We have one woman who is suing more than two years after the alleged assault occurred. She is up against the Disney legal department. Is it even possible to identify the person who was in the suit the day the alleged assault occurred? I have my doubts. How is this case going to proceed?

    Here is what one of the posters on slate had to say about this alleged incident:

    As someone who has worn full body mascot costumes for my job, I can assure you that not only can you usually not see people standing near you, you can barely do more than fold your palms, as if wearing giant, thick mittens. If the costume is elaborate or heavy enough, sometimes you can barely walk faster than a lame shuffle. If I had wanted to grope anyone, I would have needed my assistant – my literal eyes and ears – to take my floppy, cartoon hand and put it on the suspect parts before anything could happen. I’m not trying to dismiss anyone, and not saying that there aren’t bad people out there. I’m just saying I’m more inclined to suspect accidental touches before deliberate perversion.

Feministing In Your Inbox

Sign up for our Newsletter to stay in touch with Feministing
and receive regular updates and exclusive content.

174 queries. 0.492 seconds