Language Matters: A few thoughts on “Some man’s daughter.”

Every time you choose to view pornography, attend a strip club, solicit a prostitute, or in any other way, treat a woman like a piece of flesh rather than a person, remember one thing:  That girl is some man’s daughter.  From: Lessons I Learned Raising My Daughter

(Emphasis mine.)

I found this particular admonishment on The Art of Manliness . (I can’t remember how I ended up over there…link hopping, probably.)

I digress.

My thoughts for this post were sparked by that last line.

I’ve encountered this and very similar admonishments quite often when it comes to the harassment and objectification of women.

The language bothers me.

I realize that people use this and similar phrases to try to make men (generally) think critically about the fact that there is a person on the receiving end of the harassment. The admonishment plays off the question "How would you feel if someone did that to your daughter/mother/sister?" It tries to make the impersonal personal .

And I know it’s effective for some audiences, that it does make them stop and think.

But I also feel that we lose something when we use the kind of language in this type of admonishment.

We lose the idea of autonomy.

The woman as her own person. Deserving of the basic respect to not be harassed, othered, objectified.

We, instead, seem to be defining the appropriate treatment of the woman on the basis of someone else’s relation to her. Often (in my experience) that someone is male. The woman is: "Some man’s daughter"; "Some man’s wife"; "Some man’s sister." The language is reminiscent of women as property. Don’t do that. She belongs to some other man and you’re infringing on his territory.

Even if the language is a neutral "someone" rather than "some man" there’s still this air of property violation to it. You shouldn’t do that (because she’s not yours to treat that way).

I find it sad that something as simple as respecting a woman’s personhood is difficult to express (or for some to accept) without language that implicates someone else’s ownership of her.

Disclaimer: This post was written by a Feministing Community user and does not necessarily reflect the views of any Feministing columnist, editor, or executive director.

Join the Conversation