Best Letter to the Editor Ever: Pregnant women can’t do politics

It seems that not everyone is pleased that Rep. Kirsten Gillibrand (D-NY) is pregnant. Check out this amazing letter to the editor that ran in the Post Star:

First of all, I must admit that I am a male chauvinist and that there are, thankfully, differences between men and women. There are many occupations suitable for women and their physical attributes. Carrying a weapon while serving in the Armed Forces and firefighting are not suitable lines of work for women to prove that they are physically equal to men. How many male police officers feel comfortable with a 100 pound female backup?
And now, I have to add serving in the U.S. House and Senate as an occupation that may not be suitable for women.
Ms. Gillibrand’s current pregnancy makes a strong case for my opinion. Ms. Gillibrand was elected to serve her constituency, and while she is away from her elected office she cannot perform those duties. The taxpayers who were duped into voting for her will have to pay for her medical benefits. Yes, Mr. and Mrs. Taxpayer, Ms. Gillibrand receives excellent health benefits, courtesy of her constituents. We will be without representation in Congress for a time leading up to and following the child’s birth. There will be times when she and the new baby will visit doctors. You can add those days to the total that she will not be serving her constituents.
The current base salary (2006) for members of the House and Senate is $165,200 per year. I wonder if Ms. Gillibrand will do the right thing and reimburse the U.S. Treasury in the amount of $452.60, her daily salary, for each day that she is unable to perform her elected duties. For some reason, I doubt it.
Ron Blachut
Queensbury

Yeah, I doubt it too. Much in the same way I doubt that male politicians will reimburse their daily salaries when they have to go to get prostate exams or prescriptions for their Viagra. You really have to love dudes who unabashedly argue that someone having a uterus (ick, lady parts!) means that they’ll be more concerned with “women problems” than politics. It’s pathologizing women’s bodies in the worst way. But at least it makes the assholes easy to pick out.

Join the Conversation