So in response to the woman in Nebraska who is rightfully suing for the ban of the word “rape” at a rape trial, State Senator Ernie Chambers has said that he is suing god to show how frivolous lawsuits can be.
Chambers lawsuit, which was filed on Friday in Douglas County Court, seeks a permanent injunction ordering God to cease certain harmful activities and the making of terroristic threats.
The lawsuit admits God goes by all sorts of alias, names, titles and designations and it also recognizes the fact that the defendant is â€œOmnipresentâ€?.
In the lawsuit Chambers says heâ€™s tried to contact God numerous times, â€œPlaintiff, despite reasonable efforts to effectuate personal service upon Defendant (â€œCome out, come out, wherever you areâ€?) has been unable to do so.â€?
The suit also requests that the court given the â€œpeculiar circumstancesâ€? of this case waive personal service. It says being Omniscient, the plaintiff assumes God will have actual knowledge of the action.
The lawsuit accuses God â€œof making and continuing to make terroristic threats of grave harm to innumerable persons, including constituents of Plaintiff who Plaintiff has the duty to represent.â€?
It says God has caused, â€œfearsome floods, egregious earthquakes, horrendous hurricanes, terrifying tornadoes, pestilential plagues, ferocious famines, devastating droughts, genocidal wars, birth defects, and the like.â€?
The suit also says God has caused, â€œcalamitous catastrophes resulting in the wide-spread death, destruction and terrorization of millions upon millions of the Earthâ€™s inhabitants including innocent babes, infants, children, the aged and infirm without mercy or distinction.â€?
Chambers also says God â€œhas manifested neither compassion nor remorse, proclaiming that Defendant â€œwill laughâ€? when calamity comes.
Chambers asks for the court to grant him a summary judgment. He says as an alternative, he wants the judge to set a date for a hearing as â€œexpeditiouslyâ€? as possible and enter a permanent injunction enjoining God from engaging in the types of deleterious actions and the making of terroristic threats described in the lawsuit.
I pasted the whole thing, because it is just so weird. It is also extremely disappointing as Ernie Chambers is a well known civil rights activist and according to an interview in Mother Jones last year, “heâ€™s been named the â€œangriest black man in Nebraska,â€? the â€œdefender of the downtrodden,â€? and the â€œmaverick of Omaha.â€? And it’s hard to deny that Chambers lives up to such colorful titles.” How can someone with such a reputation think in anyway that banning the word “rape” at a rape trial is justified, let alone something to parody?
That really is disappointing. Thoughts?
Thanks to Azliza for the link.