We knew this was coming.

Just a week after the Supreme Court’s abortion ban, serious threats are beginning to unfold for women’s clinics across the country.
On Wednesday, a bomb was found right outside of a women’s clinic in Austin, Texas. The good thing is that at least one culprit of the attempt was caught.
Reproductive rights organizations have been alerting abortion providers of potential acts of violence due to the decision:
“We know that when abortion is in the news, we also see clinics targeted for increased violence and disruption,” said Vicki Saporta, president of the National Abortion Federation.
Like we haven’t had enough upset lately regarding choice. Sigh.

and tagged , . Bookmark the permalink. Both comments and trackbacks are currently closed.

8 Comments

  1. ambidextrous amazon
    Posted April 30, 2007 at 9:52 am | Permalink

    On a related note that’s putting the proverbial sand in my vag, here’s a link to a feministe article titled “Why is it that the media and the government never calls the “pro-lifeâ€? groups who plant bombs at women’s clinics what they are: terrorists?”
    http://www.feministe.us/blog/archives/2007/04/27/the-terrorism-that-dare-not-speak-its-name/

  2. annajcook
    Posted April 30, 2007 at 11:55 am | Permalink

    I find it tremendously irritating that people who claim to be “pro-life” are willing to resort to violence & even murder to advance their cause. I would respect a true pro-life, pacifist position much more, even if I ultimately disagreed.

  3. MNObserver
    Posted April 30, 2007 at 12:22 pm | Permalink

    And of course, the anti-abortion crowd is shocked – Shocked! – that such things happen. They cluck and wring their hands, pretending that they have nothing to do with this one lone horrible person.
    Liars.

  4. annajcook
    Posted April 30, 2007 at 1:20 pm | Permalink

    They need to read Absolute Convictions, Eyal Press’s book about anti-choice violence and how the mainstream anti-choice movement’s politics and rhetoric are intimately connected to clinic bombings and the murder of doctors.

  5. tofutti
    Posted April 30, 2007 at 11:51 pm | Permalink

    You really have to question the mind of somebody who plants bombs outside of abortion clinics or guns down doctors while holding a sign that says “Abortion Stops a Beating Heart!!”
    I don’t see anything pro-life about it.

  6. tofutti
    Posted April 30, 2007 at 11:53 pm | Permalink

    You really have to question the mind of somebody who plants bombs outside of abortion clinics or guns down doctors while holding a sign that says “Abortion Stops a Beating Heart!!”
    I don’t see anything pro-life about it.

  7. Posted May 1, 2007 at 3:59 pm | Permalink

    Pro-life indeed.

  8. Frenchwoman
    Posted September 9, 2009 at 10:23 am | Permalink

    My view is that city-making is the overarching activity that draws on a wide variety of disciplines, soft and hard, one of which is planning and another urban design, but only as two among many.
    Mostly people will need to work in interdisciplinary teams, as only occasionally is one individual able to grasp the overarching picture. It is an exercise in telling a possible story about the city and how to get there. It energizes and provides direction. It is both normative and prescriptive.
    It is not value free at this point, as city-making is a process of exerting power. In being normative the city-makers will have critically analysed how they reached their conclusions, why things work and why they don’t. It is not mere speculation.
    The skills of the storytellers need to include an understanding of the various dynamics that make cities work. It needs to be both hard-nosed and sensitive. This aspect of city-making should avoid the dull, lifeless language of traditional planning and explain why what it is suggesting could work.

169 queries. 0.734 seconds