Scarlet letter for strippers?

The City Council in San Antonio, Texas recently approved a measure that will require strippers to wear permits while they are on stage.
According to the Associated Press, the reasoning behind this deliberate public shaming of women (called a “human display ordinance,” puh-leeze) is to make it easier for police to identify dancers.
Um, isn’t stripping legal? And I’m guessing if you’re in a strip club, it would be pretty easy to identify who the dancers are. If the local cops can’t figure that shit out on their own, I’d say the City Council has a lot more to worry about than strippers.
A lawyer for clubs in the area is arguing against the measure, pointing out that it is pretty fucking dangerous for a woman to wear a piece of paper that displays her name and address.
But hey, what’s wrong with accommodating potential stalkers, right?
Via Nerve.

and tagged , , , , . Bookmark the permalink. Both comments and trackbacks are currently closed.


  1. Posted December 29, 2004 at 1:07 pm | Permalink
  2. Sara
    Posted January 2, 2005 at 4:53 am | Permalink

    You’ve got to be fucking kidding me.
    Only in my good ‘ol state of Texas, and it’s bloody ridiculous.

  3. mythago
    Posted January 2, 2005 at 2:21 pm | Permalink

    Anything in that measure that specifies, say, whether the permit must be legibly displayed? Or simply that they have to be worn?

  4. JerseyTom
    Posted January 2, 2005 at 5:34 pm | Permalink

    Yeah, tough times in Texas. A stripped I got a lapdance from last week told me she used to own a club in Texas but had just moved to NJ and was dancing in the local clubs as an independent. When I asked what brought her to Jersey, she said that the laws were getting really strict in Texas.

  5. Samantha
    Posted January 4, 2005 at 7:27 pm | Permalink

    I don’t know if the gremlins ate my post or what, but I’m reposting just because as a young feminist respectfully offering my viewpoint I can’t imagine why it would be censored away:
    “what’s wrong with accommodating potential stalkers”
    You tell me, Jessica.
    Why are you more upset strippers may have to wear permits than you are about men who see strippers getting routinely, murderously, rapingly, stalkingly violent with them? How can you concern yourself with men being more violent with strippers if they know their names, but not think about the extreme amounts of violence pseudo-named strippers currently face by their male customers? Like you said, stripping is legal, but that hasn’t helped the male violence strippers face, so what do you propose, more laws making it more illegal to commit violence against women?
    While some American feminists are preoccupied defending every woman’s right to anonymously face increased violence by men who think strippers are hurtable whores, Canadian feminists the past few weeks have been in an uproar about Canadian strip clubs abusing hundreds of Rumanian women trafficked into Canada through legal visas and then forced into prostitution via strip clubs.
    “For example, data from the Canadian Ministry of immigration report that 25 Rumanian strippers landed in the country in 2001, 216 others in 2002 and 552 in 2003.”
    I don’t know if a permit system would stem severe international abuses of trafficking and enslaving girls and women for sex work (like near the US-Mexico border), but I do know Nerve self-censors stories so they never bite the wealthy corporate sex industry hands that feed it.
    For research and details about the violence strippers and other sex workers face

  6. Posted January 22, 2005 at 7:49 pm | Permalink

    In your free time, check some relevant pages about insurance quotes insurance quotes valium valium texas holdem rules texas holdem rules poker poker casino gambling casino gambling debt consolidation loans debt consolidation loans bad credit auto loans bad credit auto loans countrywide home loans countrywide home loans unsecured loans unsecured loans homeowners insurance homeowners insurance canadian pharmacy canadian pharmacy online pharmacies online pharmacies canadian pharmacies canadian pharmacies cheapest phentermine cheapest phentermine buy levitra buy levitra generic cialis generic cialis meridia meridia reductil reductil ambien ambien butalbital butalbital propecia propecia clonazepam clonazepam prozac prozac xenical xenical fluoxetine fluoxetine adipex adipex wellbutrin wellbutrin slots slots black jack black jack craps craps roulette roulette slot machines slot machines texas hold em rules texas hold em rules cheap levitra cheap levitra levitra online levitra online

  7. GamesOnline
    Posted October 29, 2009 at 6:17 am | Permalink

    Anything in that measure that specifies, say, whether the permit must be legibly displayed? Or simply that they have to be worn?games

  8. Life
    Posted December 12, 2009 at 3:52 pm | Permalink

    The teams were to leave the Olympic Village at Heidelberg at 1 p.m. Movement was to be in one convoy and buses, to be loaded in time, had to be ready at 12 noon, loading to be completed by 12.45 p.m. The team of every country was notified of the exact position of its leading bus and of the number of buses allotted to it.
    Every bus was marked with a number, and on the roadside adjacent to the bus was placed a disc bearing the same number. Every team was told the street name and bus numbers in that street. No hitch occurred in the loading. The convoy left on time and arrived at the Richmond Cricket Ground without incident, at 1.45 p.m. There was, however, the added problem of having to move, in addition to the contingent housed at Heidelberg, the rowing and canoeing contingent from Ballarat.
    The distance of about 80 miles posed a greater problem because of the longer time involved. This contingent left Ballarat Village at 11 a.m. and went by train to Melbourne, which involved changing trains at the Spencer street terminal of the Ballarat line, for Richmond station, where the contingent arrived on time at 1.45 p.m., and walked a matter of 5 or 10 minutes from the station to the assembly area. Some protests had been raised, however, in both Villages at the time involved in attending the ceremony and the interruption to training.
    In particular, the numbers coming from Ballarat were rather disappointing, many of the leading athletes absenting themselves, maintaining that the excision of a complete day from their training at that stage could not be afforded. Both contingents were at the assembly area before 2 p.m. and were not required until 3.15 p.m. having therefore a wait of about one and a half hours. This did give rise to adverse comment. The delay could perhaps have been lessened but any breakdown in transport arrangements which was an attendant risk to such an alteration, would have had disastrous results.
    The parade was drawn up in lines across the assembly ground, each team’s position marked by its name board. There was no difficulty in making up the assembly and only 15 to 20 minutes were taken up in forming the whole parade. The controller of the march, Major J. W. Willis, with his assistant, Major N. P. Farquhar, was located in an office in the Main Stadium with telephone communication to all points, and issued orders for the parade from there. This was exactly on schedule and no hitch occurred.
    In the meantime, the Duke of Edinburgh on arrival, had been driven around the arena, on the track. The 25 minutes allowed for the arrival and presentation proved to be ample and teams were able to enter precisely on time. The interval allowed for teams to take up positions was 50 minutes; this estimate was found rather conservative. The front team took up position 8 minutes late, the delay being caused largely by teams not maintaining the 20 metres interval (in some cases they dragged almost to 30 metres). The teams tended also to spread and the specified spacing of 2 metres and 4 metres had in some cases more than doubled.

Feministing In Your Inbox

Sign up for our Newsletter to stay in touch with Feministing
and receive regular updates and exclusive content.

165 queries. 1.001 seconds